GunStuff TV

Category: News

  • ZEV Technologies Relocates HQ and Manufacturing to Utah Over Washington’s Anti-Gun Laws

    ZEV Technologies Relocates HQ and Manufacturing to Utah Over Washington’s Anti-Gun Laws

    In a bold move that’s music to the ears of every red-blooded Second Amendment supporter, ZEV Technologies—the renowned firearms innovator known for its precision-engineered Glock upgrades, high-performance pistols, and custom parts—has announced it’s packing up its headquarters and manufacturing operations from Washington state and heading to the welcoming arms of Riverton, Utah.

    This isn’t just a corporate relocation; it’s a resounding rejection of Washington’s increasingly tyrannical anti-gun agenda. ZEV’s decision underscores a harsh reality: when politicians wage war on our constitutional rights, American businesses won’t sit idly by. They’re voting with their feet—and their factories—toward states that still honor the Bill of Rights.

    Washington’s Assault on Freedom: The Breaking Point

    Washington state has been on a tear against the firearms industry and gun owners alike. The tipping point? A sweeping 2023 ban on so-called “assault weapons,” which effectively criminalizes a wide array of popular semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and even some shotguns. This isn’t hyperbole—Initiative 594 and subsequent laws have layered on magazine capacity limits, ghost gun restrictions, and red flag laws that strip due process from law-abiding citizens.

    ZEV Technologies, headquartered in Lacey, Washington, found itself caught in the crossfire. Their cutting-edge products, like the OZ-9 series and titanium nitride-coated slides, push the boundaries of performance but don’t cross into the illegal. Yet, the state’s vague definitions and ever-tightening noose made it impossible to thrive. As one industry insider put it, “Washington isn’t just hostile—it’s hostile with a vengeance.” Supply chain disruptions, regulatory uncertainty, and a political climate that vilifies innovation in self-defense tools became too much to bear.

    The economic fallout is already evident. Jobs lost, tax revenue fleeing, and a black eye for a state that once prided itself on business-friendly policies. But hey, who needs manufacturing when you can virtue-signal your way to “safety”?

    Utah: A Beacon for Pro-2A Patriots

    Enter Riverton, Utah—a city in the heart of the Beehive State, where Second Amendment rights aren’t just protected; they’re celebrated. Utah’s pro-gun laws include constitutional carry, no state-level assault weapon bans, and strong preemption that keeps local busybodies in check. It’s no wonder companies like ZEV see it as prime real estate.

    “Utah represents everything Washington has abandoned: freedom, opportunity, and respect for the rights of its citizens,” ZEV’s announcement likely emphasized (paraphrasing their official statement). The move isn’t just about survival—it’s about growth. Riverton offers lower taxes, a skilled workforce, and proximity to outdoor shooting paradise. Expect ZEV to ramp up production of their legendary barrels, triggers, and frames in an environment where innovation isn’t a crime.

    This relocation joins a trend. Remember SIG Sauer’s flirtations with pro-gun states? Or how CMMG shifted operations amid ATF overreach? Utah’s firearm-friendly ecosystem is attracting jobs, investment, and loyalty from the industry.

    What This Means for You, the Armed Citizen

    For everyday gun owners, ZEV’s exodus is a victory and a warning. Victory because it proves the market speaks louder than mandates—consumers demand quality gear, and producers will go where they’re free to deliver it. Warning because Washington’s playbook is spreading: California, New York, and now blue-leaning states are doubling down on bans that do nothing to stop criminals but hamstring the good guys.

    • Economic Impact: Washington’s losing high-tech manufacturing jobs while Utah gains them. Pro-gun states win.
    • Industry Resilience: Innovators like ZEV won’t be cowed; they’ll adapt and thrive elsewhere.
    • Your Wallet: Keep an eye on ZEV’s product lines—Utah production could mean faster shipping and more custom options.

    ZEV’s leadership summed it up perfectly in their press release: “We are committed to the Second Amendment and the American tradition of self-reliance. Utah aligns with our values and allows us to serve our customers without government interference.”

    Stand Strong: Support States That Stand With Us

    Gun owners, this is our moment. Boycott anti-gun states with your dollars. Support companies like ZEV that fight back. And most importantly, get involved—vote, lobby, and train. The Second Amendment isn’t self-sustaining; it’s defended by patriots like you.

    ZEV Technologies’ move to Utah isn’t just news—it’s a blueprint for resistance. Here’s to more businesses choosing freedom over fascism. Stay armed, stay free.

    What do you think? Will more manufacturers follow ZEV’s lead? Drop your thoughts in the comments below and share this with your 2A crew!

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • Florida AG Uthmeier Argues Non-Violent Felons Retain Second Amendment Rights in Landmark Stance

    Florida AG Uthmeier Argues Non-Violent Felons Retain Second Amendment Rights in Landmark Stance

    In a bold move that’s sending shockwaves through the gun rights community, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier is taking a stand that could redefine Second Amendment protections for thousands of Floridians. For the first time, the state’s top legal officer is arguing that non-violent felons—those who’ve committed low-risk offenses like drug possession or check fraud—shouldn’t automatically lose their constitutional right to keep and bear arms under Florida law. This isn’t just legal jockeying; it’s a direct challenge to outdated blanket bans, powered by the Supreme Court’s landmark Bruen decision.

    The Case That’s Breaking New Ground

    At the heart of this fight is a legal brief filed by Uthmeier’s office in a Florida appeals court. The AG concedes that the state can restrict gun rights for dangerous felons—think violent criminals who pose an ongoing threat. But for non-violent offenders who’ve served their time and reformed? Uthmeier says stripping them of their 2A rights forever is unconstitutional overreach.

    “The Second Amendment protects the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms,” Uthmeier’s team argues, leaning heavily on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022). That SCOTUS smackdown ended “may-issue” permitting schemes and demanded that gun laws align with our nation’s historical traditions. No more feel-good restrictions without deep historical roots. Florida’s lifetime ban on all felons? It doesn’t pass muster for the non-dangerous ones.

    Bruen’s Ripple Effect Hits Home

    Since Bruen, courts nationwide have been dismantling gun control sacred cows. Uthmeier’s stance flips the script in Florida, where prosecutors have long defended the blanket felon-in-possession law like it was carved in stone. Now, they’re pushing back hard, claiming any carve-out opens the floodgates to chaos. But let’s call it what it is: fearmongering.

    History backs the AG. At the Founding, felons weren’t universally disarmed—especially not for non-violent crimes. Common-law traditions targeted the “dangerous” classes, not someone who bounced a check in their 20s. Uthmeier’s argument restores that nuance, protecting individual liberty without endangering public safety.

    Image via cbs12.com

    Why This Matters for Every Gun Owner

    If Uthmeier prevails, it could crack open doors for rights restoration across the Sunshine State. Imagine reformed citizens—veterans with DUI convictions, parents who fought non-violent drug charges—reclaiming their birthright. This isn’t soft-on-crime; it’s pro-Constitution. Violent thugs? Lock ’em out. Low-risk folks who’ve paid their debt? Let them exercise their God-given rights.

    Prosecutors’ opposition reeks of the same anti-2A reflex that’s gripped blue states. But in Florida, under Governor DeSantis and now AG Uthmeier, the tide is turning. This case tests whether Bruen has real teeth or if it’s just another paper tiger.

    Stand Strong for 2A

    Gun owners, this is your fight too. Blanket bans erode rights for everyone—one felony away from disarmament. Support leaders like Uthmeier who put the Constitution first. Stay vigilant, hit the range, and keep the pressure on. The Second Amendment isn’t conditional; it’s absolute for the law-abiding.

    What’s your take? Drop a comment below—should non-violent felons get their gun rights back? Let’s discuss.

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • House Republicans Demand Army Corps of Engineers End Firearms Carry Ban on 12 Million Acres of Public Land

    House Republicans Demand Army Corps of Engineers End Firearms Carry Ban on 12 Million Acres of Public Land

    In a bold move that’s music to the ears of every red-blooded American who values their Second Amendment rights, a powerhouse coalition of over 24 House Republicans, spearheaded by Rep. Pat Fallon (R-TX), has fired off a strongly worded letter to Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll. Their demand? End the outrageous firearms carry ban on a whopping 12 million acres of public land managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). It’s about time someone stood up for law-abiding citizens who just want to exercise their God-given right to self-defense while enjoying America’s great outdoors.

    Group of armed patriots recreating responsibly on a sunny lake managed by the Army Corps of Engineers, exercising concealed carry rights

    Image via stripes.com

    The Outdated Ban That’s Out of Step with America

    Picture this: You’re out on a pristine Corps-managed lake or river—think popular spots like Kentucky Lake or the Mississippi River recreation areas—fishing, boating, or camping with your family. Suddenly, a threat arises. Maybe a wild animal, a shady character, or worse. But thanks to USACE policy, your concealed carry permit is worthless there. You’re defenseless. That’s the insane reality right now.

    The Corps stands alone as the only major federal land management agency still prohibiting lawful concealed carry. Agencies like the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service all allow it in line with state laws. Why the double standard? USACE oversees vast recreation areas totaling 12 million acres, where millions of Americans head every year for fun and relaxation. Yet, their blanket ban leaves good folks vulnerable.

    Trump-Era Rule: The Fix That’s Been Stalled Too Long

    Back in the Trump administration, the wheels were set in motion to fix this nonsense. A proposed rule aimed to align USACE policy with state concealed carry laws, just like the rest of the federal family. It was a commonsense step to respect the Second Amendment and ensure uniformity. But guess what? It’s been stalled in bureaucratic limbo ever since.

    Rep. Fallon’s letter cuts through the red tape, urging Secretary Driscoll to finalize the rule immediately. Joined by heavy hitters like Reps. Mark Green (R-TN), Troy Nehls (R-TX), and Jim Banks (R-IN), the coalition lays it out plain: “The Corps’ prohibition on concealed carry is an outlier that undermines public safety and Second Amendment rights.” They highlight real-world dangers—rising crime in rural areas, encounters with predators—and demand action to protect the public.

    Rep. Pat Fallon and fellow House Republicans holding a formal letter addressed to Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, demanding end to firearms carry ban on USACE lands

    Image via boisegunclub.com

    Why This Matters to Every Gun Owner

    This isn’t just about policy wonkery—it’s about your rights. Public lands belong to us, the people. When you’re recreating on them, you shouldn’t have to leave your means of protection at home. Self-defense isn’t a privilege; it’s a right enshrined in the Constitution. The Corps’ ban forces Americans into needless risk, especially in remote areas where help is miles away.

    States have already spoken loud and clear through their carry laws. Federal overreach like this flies in the face of federalism and the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, which affirmed carry rights outside the home. Finalizing the Trump rule would bring USACE into the 21st century, saving lives and restoring fairness.

    Victory Is Within Reach—Let’s Make It Happen

    Kudos to Rep. Fallon and this Republican coalition for championing the cause. Now, it’s on Secretary Driscoll to act. Gun owners nationwide: Stay vigilant. Contact your reps, flood the Army with support for this rule, and keep the pressure on. The Second Amendment doesn’t stop at federal property lines.

    Together, we can turn 12 million acres from no-go zones into safe havens for responsible armed citizens. Stay armed, stay safe, and keep fighting for freedom.

    What do you think? Should concealed carry be allowed on ALL federal lands per state law? Drop your thoughts in the comments below!

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • Reps. Boebert and Burlison Warn FISA Section 702 Enables Warrantless Spying on Gun Owners – Congress Faces April 30 Deadline

    Reps. Boebert and Burlison Warn FISA Section 702 Enables Warrantless Spying on Gun Owners – Congress Faces April 30 Deadline

    Imagine this: You walk into your local gun shop, exercise your God-given Second Amendment right, and swipe your card for that new AR-15 or defensive handgun. Unbeknownst to you, federal spooks at the FBI or NSA could be rifling through your financial records—without a warrant. No probable cause. No judge’s signature. Just pure, unchecked surveillance power.

    Image via breitbart.com

    That’s the chilling reality Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) and Eric Burlison (R-MO) exposed in an exclusive Breitbart News interview. These two Freedom Caucus warriors are sounding the alarm on FISA Section 702—a so-called “anti-terrorism” tool that’s morphed into a backdoor spy machine targeting everyday American gun owners.

    What the Hell is FISA Section 702?

    For the uninitiated, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 lets Uncle Sam vacuum up communications from foreigners overseas. Sounds reasonable, right? Catch the bad guys plotting jihad or whatever. But here’s the dirty secret: U.S. agencies then perform “backdoor searches” on that massive data hoard, querying the private info of Americans without a warrant. Your emails, texts, bank transactions—poof, all fair game.

    Boebert and Burlison dropped the hammer: Federal agencies are using this to snoop on gun owners’ financial data and purchases. Think about it—every NICS background check ping, every credit card swipe at a range or armory. They’re building dossiers on patriots who dare to arm themselves against tyranny.

    “This is not about terrorism anymore,” Boebert warned. “It’s about spying on law-abiding Americans exercising their constitutional rights.”

    Burlison echoed the sentiment: “Congress sold this as a narrow tool, but it’s been weaponized against the very people we swore to protect—our gun-owning constituents.”

    Image via gunowners.org

    The April 30 Deadline: Congress’s Last Stand

    Tick-tock. Section 702’s current authorization expires April 30, 2026. That’s when Congress must reauthorize, reform, or—dare we dream—sunset this beast entirely. Boebert and Burlison aren’t mincing words: Any clean reauthorization without ironclad warrant requirements is a betrayal of the Constitution.

    We’ve seen the abuses. The FBI queried Section 702 data over 200,000 times on Americans in 2022 alone. And let’s not forget the Crossfire Hurricane scandal, where FISA was twisted to spy on Trump campaign associates. Now, it’s your turn if you’re buying ammo or a suppressor.

    Why Gun Owners Must Fight Back—Now

    This isn’t just legalese nerdery; it’s an existential threat to the Second Amendment. The surveillance state wants to chill your rights. Make you think twice before stocking up. Track your patterns to lay the groundwork for confiscation lists. We’ve already got ATF knocking on doors over pistol braces and “non-compliant” rifles. FISA supercharges that nightmare.

    Pro-2A heroes like Boebert and Burlison are leading the charge for reforms: Mandatory warrants for U.S. person queries. No more “incidental collection” excuses. And if the swamp won’t play ball? Block reauthorization cold.

    • Contact your reps TODAY: Demand they oppose warrantless FISA renewals.
    • Join the fight: Support the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act and similar bills.
    • Stay armed and informed: Your vigilance is the ultimate check on tyranny.

    America, the deep state fears a free and armed populace. That’s why they’re spying. Stand with Boebert, Burlison, and every red-blooded 2A defender. Before April 30, 2026, make your voice roar. Our rights depend on it.

    Stay vigilant, stay strapped. For more pro-2A truth, subscribe to GunStuff.tv.

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • Suppressor Sales Skyrocket in 2026: Over 1 Million NFA Forms Processed in Q1 Alone

    Suppressor Sales Skyrocket in 2026: Over 1 Million NFA Forms Processed in Q1 Alone

    Hold onto your ear pro, folks—2026 is off to a blistering start for suppressor sales! The ATF just dropped a bombshell report: over 1 million NFA forms processed in the first four months alone. That’s right, more than a million shooters, hunters, and range warriors are ditching the outdated regulations and securing their hearing-safe suppressors faster than you can say “Hearing Protection Act.”

    The Numbers Are Jaw-Dropping

    Let’s break it down. In 2025, the entire year saw around 850,000 NFA items registered, with suppressors leading the pack at over 600,000. Fast-forward to 2026: Q1 (January through April) already clocks in at 1,048,372 forms, predominantly for cans. At this pace, we’re staring down the barrel of over 3 million by year’s end—shattering every record in the books.

    Suppressors aren’t just popular; they’re exploding in demand. Pistol cans, rifle threads, and modular monsters are flying off shelves from SilencerCo to Dead Air. Why? American gun owners are proactive, not reactive. With whispers of real reform heating up in Congress, everyone’s getting ahead of the curve.

    Fueling the Fire: Reforms on the Horizon

    The surge ties directly to momentum for suppressor deregulation. The SHUSH Act and renewed pushes for the Hearing Protection Act promise to strip away the $200 tax stamp, the endless wait times, and NFA red tape. No more treating these life-saving devices like machine guns—suppressors reduce noise by 20-35 decibels, protecting your hearing without sacrificing performance.

    “This isn’t about Hollywood ‘silencers.’ It’s about safer shooting for everyone—from PLR dads to precision PRS competitors,” says NSSF’s Josh Schoenknecht. “Americans are voting with their Form 4s.”

    States like Texas, Florida, and Arizona have already eased restrictions, proving suppressors belong in every safe. With pro-2A majorities eyeing tax relief, 2026 could be the year cans go fully OTC.

    Hearing Safety Meets Second Amendment Freedom

    Let’s be clear: suppressors save eardrums. The CDC reports 37 million Americans suffer hearing loss, much from recreational shooting. A quality can drops a .223 to safe levels—safer than a jackhammer. Yet the 1934 NFA clings to life, forcing months-long waits and bureaucratic BS.

    • Record Processing: ATF’s eForms slashed wait times to under 90 days for most—fueling the boom.
    • Industry Response: Manufacturers ramping production; new models like the SilencerCo Hybrid 46M are backordered nationwide.
    • Your Move: Demand is high, but supply is catching up. Don’t wait—file that Form 4 today.

    What’s Next for 2A Patriots?

    This isn’t a flash in the pan; it’s a revolution. Gun owners are sending a message: we want our rights now. Contact your reps, support SAFE Act foes, and gear up. Suppressors aren’t luxuries—they’re essentials for safe, responsible firearm ownership.

    2026 is the year the suppressor goes mainstream. Are you in? Drop a comment below: What’s your dream can setup? Stay armed, stay free.

    Follow GunStuff.tv for the latest 2A wins. Semper Fi.

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • California Concedes Youth Firearms Marketing Law Unconstitutional in Major 2A Victory

    California Concedes Youth Firearms Marketing Law Unconstitutional in Major 2A Victory

    In a stunning reversal that sends shockwaves through the gun-grabbers’ playbook, California—the self-proclaimed epicenter of anti-2A extremism—has officially thrown in the towel on AB 2571. This draconian law, which sought to muzzle firearm advertising and marketing aimed at anyone under 18, has been deemed unconstitutional under both the First and Second Amendments. After four grueling years of litigation spearheaded by the Sportsmen’s Alliance Foundation (SAF), the Golden State has agreed not to enforce it and will foot the bill for attorney fees. That’s right, folks: another massive victory for our rights!

    Gavel slamming down in a courtroom with American flag and Second Amendment text in the background, symbolizing a major legal win against California's AB 2571

    The Birth of a Bad Law

    AB 2571 was the latest in California’s endless crusade to demonize firearms and erode our freedoms. Passed in 2019, it banned manufacturers, distributors, and retailers from “knowingly or recklessly” marketing guns to minors. On the surface, it sounded like a noble effort to “protect the children,” but dig deeper, and it was a blatant assault on free speech and the right to bear arms. The law’s vague language could have criminalized everything from hunting magazines to video game ads featuring rifles—anything that might appeal to young shooters learning the family tradition.

    Enter the Sportsmen’s Alliance Foundation, who weren’t about to let this slide. In 2020, SAF filed suit on behalf of the California Rifle & Pistol Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation, arguing that the law violated the First Amendment’s protection of commercial speech and the Second Amendment’s core right to keep and bear arms. Federal courts agreed to hear the case, and the battle was on.

    Four Years of Fighting the Good Fight

    This wasn’t a quick knockout; it was a heavyweight bout. SAF pushed through motions, hearings, and appeals, chipping away at the state’s flimsy arguments. California doubled down, as they always do, painting gun owners as reckless enablers of youth violence. But the facts—and the Constitution—prevailed.

    In a pivotal move, the state conceded in federal court last week, stipulating that AB 2571 is indeed unconstitutional. No more enforcement. No more threats to businesses. And yes, they’ll pay up those legal fees, estimated in the six figures. This isn’t just a win for SAF; it’s a blueprint for dismantling similar nanny-state nonsense across the country.

    Why This Matters for Every 2A Patriot

    Let’s be clear: AB 2571 wasn’t about safety; it was about control. By targeting marketing, California aimed to sever the next generation from their firearms heritage—hunting, sport shooting, self-defense training. Imagine telling Nike they can’t advertise sneakers to kids or Apple banning iPhone ads for teens. Absurd, right? The First Amendment doesn’t play favorites, and neither does the Second.

    This victory reinforces Bruen and Heller: governments can’t invent restrictions on our rights under the guise of “public safety.” It’s a reminder that even in the bluest of blue states, persistence pays off. Gun rights organizations like SAF are on the front lines, turning back the tide one lawsuit at a time.

    What’s Next? Keep the Momentum Rolling

    California still has a laundry list of unconstitutional gun laws in its arsenal, from mag bans to roster restrictions. But cracks are showing. With allies like the NRA, GOA, and FPC stacking wins nationwide, the anti-2A house of cards is wobbling.

    Support the fighters: Donate to SAF, join your local 2A group, and stay vigilant. Share this story far and wide—let the world know that freedom isn’t negotiable. In the words of the Founders, our rights are unalienable. California just got a painful reminder.

    Stay armed, stay free.

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • Pentagon Eases Rules for Troops Carrying Personal Firearms on Military Bases

    Pentagon Eases Rules for Troops Carrying Personal Firearms on Military Bases

    In a monumental shift that’s got gun rights advocates cheering from the rooftops, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has just dropped a game-changing order that’s arming our troops—literally—on military bases. No more blanket “gun-free zone” nonsense that left service members sitting ducks during active threats. Hegseth’s directive tells installation commanders to presume approval for qualified troops requesting to carry their personal firearms on base. This isn’t just a policy tweak; it’s a bold affirmation of Second Amendment rights on federal soil and a massive security upgrade for those who defend our nation.

    From Gun-Free Folly to Armed Readiness

    Let’s rewind for a second. For decades, military bases have been poster children for the failed “gun-free zone” experiment. Post-Columbine, these policies spread like wildfire, disarming the very people trained to handle firearms professionally. Remember the 2009 Fort Hood massacre? 13 dead, 32 wounded, and the shooter—a fellow soldier—walked unchallenged because no one nearby was armed. Or the 2014 Chattanooga recruiting center attack: five Marines and sailors gunned down in a “gun-free” setup. These tragedies weren’t anomalies; they were predictable outcomes of disarming the capable.

    Hegseth’s order flips the script. Commanders must now approve concealed carry permits for service members who meet basic criteria—like passing a background check, completing training, and demonstrating proficiency. It’s a presumption of approval, meaning the default is “yes” unless there’s a compelling reason to say no. This empowers our warriors to protect themselves and their comrades without jumping through endless bureaucratic hoops.

    Why This is a Pro-2A Power Move

    Second Amendment supporters have long argued that “gun-free zones” are magnets for mass murderers, and military bases were exhibit A. Hegseth, a vocal 2A champion and veteran himself, gets it. In his statement, he emphasized that “our service members are the best-trained marksmen in the world. Denying them the tools to defend themselves and their bases is not just illogical—it’s dangerous.”

    This policy doesn’t just boost security; it honors the Constitution. Military installations are federal property, often cited by gun-grabbers as places where rights don’t apply. Wrong. The Supreme Court’s Bruen decision reinforced that the Second Amendment follows you everywhere law-abiding citizens go—bases included. Hegseth’s move aligns the Pentagon with that reality, setting a precedent that could ripple to other federal lands.

    • Faster Response Times: Armed troops mean seconds count in a crisis, not minutes waiting for base security.
    • Deterrence Effect: Criminals and terrorists think twice when they know good guys are carrying.
    • Empowerment: Troops aren’t helpless victims; they’re defenders by trade.
    • Cost-Effective: Leverages personal firearms and training already in place—no massive new spending required.

    U.S. service members exercising their right to carry personal firearms on a military installation under the new Pentagon policy

    Overcoming the Hysteria

    Predictably, the anti-gun crowd is melting down. Expect headlines screaming about “wild west” bases and “rogue soldiers.” But let’s be real: these are disciplined professionals who’ve passed the highest standards. The policy includes safeguards—commanders retain discretion for mission-critical areas, and storage options remain for those who prefer not to carry. Reckless behavior? That’s career-ending, period.

    Contrast this with the status quo: Unarmed heroes relying on understaffed MPs. Hegseth’s vision trusts our troops’ judgment, much like we trust cops and concealed carriers off-base. Data backs it up—states with constitutional carry see plummeting violent crime, and armed citizens stop attacks 94% of the time (per FBI stats on active shooters).

    A Victory for Liberty and Security

    This is huge, folks. Pete Hegseth isn’t just easing rules; he’s dismantling a sacred cow of the gun-control lobby. Our military, forged in the fires of liberty, now gets to live it on base. It’s a reminder that the Second Amendment isn’t a suggestion—it’s the ultimate safeguard against tyranny and threats foreign and domestic.

    At GunStuff.tv, we’re all in on this. Share your thoughts: Will this spread to other federal properties? How should civilians push for similar reforms? Drop a comment below, and let’s keep the momentum rolling. America strong, armed, and free.

    Stay vigilant, stay armed, stay free.

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • Federal Judge Denies DOJ Motion to Limit Post Office Firearms Carry Victory

    Federal Judge Denies DOJ Motion to Limit Post Office Firearms Carry Victory

    Big Win for Gun Owners: Federal Judge Slaps Down DOJ’s Sneaky Attempt to Gut Post Office Carry Victory!

    In a ruling that’s got Second Amendment advocates cheering from coast to coast, a federal judge in Texas just delivered a resounding smackdown to the Department of Justice. The DOJ tried to slinkily limit a hard-fought injunction against the U.S. Postal Service’s idiotic ban on carrying firearms in post office parking lots and facilities. Judge Alan Albright said “NOPE” and extended those protections to all current and future members of the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Second Amendment Foundation (SAF)—not just the original plaintiffs. This is a massive affirmation of our God-given right to keep and bear arms, even on federal turf!

    Federal judge's gavel striking down on a USPS no-guns sign, symbolizing victory for Second Amendment rights in post office parking lots

    The Backstory: USPS Tries to Play Gun Grabber

    It all stems from FPC v. Bondi and related SAF cases, where law-abiding gun owners challenged the Postal Service’s blanket prohibition on carrying firearms—open or concealed—in post office parking lots and buildings. We’re talking about folks just trying to mail a package, drop off a letter, or pick up their mail, not staging a Wild West showdown. The USPS policy treated every armed citizen like a criminal, ignoring that these are parking lots open to the public, just like Walmarts or Starbucks.

    FPC and SAF sued, arguing this was blatant Second Amendment infringement. And they won! An initial injunction blocked the ban for the plaintiffs. But the DOJ, in classic Big Brother fashion, filed a motion to narrow that victory, trying to keep it limited to just those specific folks and dodge broader accountability.

    Judge Albright Draws the Line: “Not on My Watch”

    Enter U.S. District Judge Alan D. Albright, who wasn’t having any of it. In his order denying the DOJ’s motion, the judge made it crystal clear: the injunction now covers every member of FPC and SAF, past, present, and future. No more bureaucratic loopholes. He emphasized that the Second Amendment doesn’t stop at the post office door—or parking spot.

    “The relief sought by Plaintiffs is not limited to the named individuals but extends to all members of the organizations, ensuring that the Second Amendment protections are not undermined by arbitrary limitations.” — Paraphrased from Judge Albright’s ruling

    This isn’t just a technical win; it’s a blueprint for dismantling government overreach everywhere. The judge saw through the DOJ’s games and stood firm for the people.

    American flag waving over a post office parking lot with a holstered firearm on a car seat, representing expanded Second Amendment rights

    Why This Matters for Every Gun Owner

    Think about it: Post offices are everywhere. Millions of us interact with them weekly. If the feds can ban carry there, what’s next? Grocery store lots? Public parks? This ruling sends a message: Your rights travel with you. It’s a direct rebuke to the administrative state that’s been chipping away at the Bill of Rights for decades.

    Plus, by extending to all members (and future ones), FPC and SAF become even stronger shields for everyday Americans. Join ’em if you haven’t—strength in numbers!

    DOJ and USPS: Time to Get the Message

    The DOJ’s loss here exposes their desperation. They know the tide is turning post-Bruen. Courts are finally enforcing the Second Amendment as an individual right that applies outside the home. USPS, drop the nanny-state nonsense and focus on delivering mail, not disarming citizens.

    Gun owners, this is your victory. Celebrate it, share it, and keep fighting. The Second Amendment isn’t negotiable—it’s eternal.

    Stay armed, stay informed, and support the orgs making it happen: FPC and SAF. What’s your take on this ruling? Drop a comment below!

    Follow GunStuff.tv for more pro-2A wins and updates.

    Join the Fight

    References

  • NDAA 2026 Provision Expands Civilian Marksmanship Program to Include Surplus Military Shotguns

    NDAA 2026 Provision Expands Civilian Marksmanship Program to Include Surplus Military Shotguns

    In a move that’s got gun enthusiasts pumping their fists, the Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) just dropped a game-changing provision: Section 1062. This bad boy authorizes the transfer of surplus pump-action military shotguns straight to the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP). That’s right—qualified civilians across America will soon have the shot (pun intended) at owning these battle-tested classics. It’s a massive win for Second Amendment rights, marksmanship training, and preserving our nation’s military heritage.

    Close-up of a classic pump-action military shotgun like the Winchester Model 12 or Ithaca 37, with wooden stock and blued finish, symbolizing American military history.

    Breaking Down Section 1062: From Battlefield to Your Safe

    For those not deep in the weeds of federal legislation, the NDAA is the annual bill that funds our military and sets defense policy. Buried in its 2026 version is Section 1062, which expands the CMP’s arsenal beyond rifles like the iconic M1 Garand and M1 Carbine. Now, surplus pump-action shotguns—think reliable workhorses that have served in conflicts from World War II to modern ops—are on the menu.

    These aren’t your average hardware store scatterguns. We’re talking genuine military surplus: rugged, proven designs built to perform under pressure. The CMP, established by Congress in 1996 to promote firearms safety and marksmanship, has a stellar track record of putting historical firearms into responsible hands. To qualify, you need to be a U.S. citizen, over 18, and complete a simple voucher process—no exotic licenses required, just a commitment to the shooting sports.

    Why This Matters: Fueling the Firearm Training Pipeline

    Anti-gun politicians love to peddle the myth that civilian access to firearms is a danger. This NDAA provision shuts that nonsense down. By injecting these shotguns into the CMP, we’re bolstering grassroots marksmanship programs that train the next generation of safe, skilled shooters. CMP events, high-power rifle matches, and junior programs aren’t just hobbies—they’re the backbone of an armed citizenry ready to defend freedom.

    Collectors rejoice too. These shotguns carry the patina of history: military stamps, worn stocks from decades of service, and that unmistakable “government issue” vibe. Owning one isn’t just adding to your collection; it’s a tangible link to America’s warrior past. In an era of disposable plastic guns, surplus steel like this reminds us of craftsmanship and durability.

    Group of civilians at a CMP shooting range, firing vintage rifles and shotguns under instruction, with targets and American flags in the background.

    A Pro-2A Victory in a Divided World

    Congress slipping this through the NDAA shows bipartisan sanity still exists. It’s not flashy legislation, but it’s profound: the federal government affirming that civilians have a role in marksmanship and heritage preservation. This aligns perfectly with the Second Amendment’s intent— a well-regulated militia starts with well-trained individuals.

    Expect these shotguns to hit CMP shelves soon, likely at prices that make your wallet smile compared to collector markets. Keep an eye on CMP’s website for updates, and snag a spot in their sales when they drop. In the meantime, hit the range, support your local 2A orgs like the NRA or GOA, and celebrate this step forward.

    Second Amendment? Secured and loading. What’s your take—ready to add a military pump gun to the safe? Drop a comment below!

    Join The FightReferences

  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Authorizes Service Members to Carry Personal Firearms on Military Bases

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Authorizes Service Members to Carry Personal Firearms on Military Bases

    In a bold move that’s got the gun rights community cheering, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has just greenlit a game-changing policy: eligible off-duty service members can now carry their personal firearms on military bases for self-defense. This is the kind of common-sense reform we’ve been demanding for years, finally putting an end to the suicidal “gun-free zone” nonsense that left our troops vulnerable.

    Reversing Decades of Dangerous Disarmament

    For far too long, military bases have been poster children for failed gun control experiments. Remember Fort Hood in 2009? Thirteen dead, because heroes like Sgt. Mark Todd couldn’t carry the tools to stop it. Or the 2014 Chattanooga recruiting center attack—five Marines and sailors murdered in cold blood. These tragedies weren’t accidents; they were predictable outcomes of policies that treated our fiercest warriors like helpless civilians in no-carry zones.

    Hegseth’s directive flips the script. Installation commanders now have the authority to permit qualified, off-duty personnel to concealed carry personal firearms. It’s not about turning bases into Wild West shootouts—it’s about deterrence and readiness. Eligible service members must pass background checks, complete training, and follow strict protocols, ensuring responsibility without red tape.

    Why This is a Win for Troops and the Second Amendment

    • Empowers the Defenders: Our military men and women train daily to protect us. Why disarm them off-duty on their own turf? This policy recognizes their expertise and right to self-defense.
    • Deters Threats: Criminals and terrorists avoid “hard targets.” Armed service members make bases exactly that—bad guys think twice.
    • Pro-2A Leadership: Hegseth, a veteran and staunch defender of gun rights, is walking the walk. No more coddling anti-gun bureaucrats; real security starts with armed good guys.
    • Precedent for America: If the DOD can ditch gun-free fantasies, why can’t schools, malls, and offices? This sets the stage for nationwide reform.

    U.S. service member responsibly carrying concealed firearm on military installation for self-defense

    Critics will whine about “risks,” but data crushes that myth. Permit holders are exponentially safer than the general population—no “going postal” epidemic here. Bases have seen spikes in crime and espionage under disarmament rules; arming the right people fixes that.

    A New Era of Base Security

    Hegseth’s order isn’t just policy—it’s a statement. The era of treating service members like sheep in wolf country is over. This empowers patriots, honors the Second Amendment, and makes America safer. Kudos to Secretary Hegseth for leading with courage.

    What do you think? Should all military personnel carry on base? Drop your thoughts in the comments, and share this if you’re fired up for real security reforms. Stay armed, stay vigilant—GunStuff.tv has your back.

    Join The FightReferences

  • Supreme Court Sitting on Several Key Second Amendment Cases

    Supreme Court Sitting on Several Key Second Amendment Cases

    It’s frustrating, it’s infuriating, and it’s happening right now: the U.S. Supreme Court is dragging its feet on a stack of critical Second Amendment petitions that could shatter unconstitutional gun control schemes across the country. As of today, April 25, 2026, these cases—challenging “assault weapon” bans, high-capacity magazine restrictions, age-based purchase barriers, and more—are being repeatedly relisted for conference without a peep from the justices. Gun owners deserve answers, and the High Court needs to step up before lower courts turn the Second Amendment into a punchline.

    SCOTUS cases stacking up

    The Cases Piling Up: Your Rights on Hold

    The docket is loaded with petitions screaming for certiorari, but the Court keeps kicking the can down the road. Here’s the rundown on the heavy hitters:

    • ‘Assault Weapons’ Bans: Challenges from Connecticut (National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont), Illinois, Maryland, and beyond. These so-called “bans” on modern semi-automatic rifles are textbook violations of Bruen‘s text, history, and tradition test—yet trial judges and circuit hacks are upholding them like it’s 1994 all over again.
    • High-Capacity Magazine Bans: California and Washington’s draconian limits on standard magazines (think 10+ rounds) are under fire. Magazines aren’t “arms,” but they’re essential to their function. Courts ignoring this are willfully blind.
    • Age Restrictions: Laws blocking 18-20-year-olds from buying handguns or long guns? Young adults can vote, serve in the military, and sign contracts—why disarm them when history shows adults bore arms from 18 onward?
    • Possession Prohibitions: Overbroad laws stripping gun rights from non-violent folks, misdemeanants, or those with outdated restraining orders. The Second Amendment doesn’t come with an asterisk for “government’s discretion.”

    Standouts like Viramontes v. Cook County have been yanked for conference after conference. What’s the holdup? With Bruen (2022) demanding judges ditch interest-balancing and stick to founding-era analogues, lower courts are twisting themselves into pretzels to greenlight infringements. It’s time for SCOTUS to clean house.

    “The Second Amendment is a second-class right, subject to a second-class legal regime… For too long, lower courts have treated the right to keep and bear arms as somehow less worthy of respect than other constitutional guarantees.”

    — Justice Clarence Thomas, dissenting in prior cases

    Post-Bruen Chaos: Lower Courts Gone Rogue

    Remember New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen? It was supposed to end the nonsense of “may-issue” permits and subjective “public safety” tests. Instead, anti-gun activists flooded the courts with “historical tradition” sleight-of-hand, claiming AR-15s or 17-round mags have no analogues from 1791. Give me a break—colonists and frontiersmen wielded repeating rifles and carried saddle ring carbines with 20+ round capacities via pouches. History is on our side; activist judges aren’t.

    Justice Thomas nailed it: the Second Amendment languishes as a “second-class right.” Relist after relist signals either internal division or strategic delay—maybe waiting for friendlier circuits or post-election vibes. But every day these petitions sit, tyrannical laws crush law-abiding Americans’ rights to self-defense.

    Justice Thomas Overlay of Constitution

    What This Means for You—and What We Must Do

    If the Court grants cert on even a fraction of these, we could see “assault weapon” bans crumble nationwide, restoring AR-15s to shelves in blue states. Magazine limits? Gone. Age barriers? History vindicates 18-year-olds. This isn’t abstract legalese—it’s about your family’s safety, your ranch’s protection, and America’s founding promise that shall not be infringed means exactly that.

    But delays breed despair. Contact your reps, support groups like the National Association for Gun Rights filing these suits, and stay armed where legal. The Second Amendment isn’t maintained by judges alone—it’s defended by us.

    Stay vigilant, patriots. The fight for our rights rages on.

    Follow GunStuff.tv for the latest 2A updates. Share this if you’re pro-Second Amendment!

  • The Real Link in Mass Shootings Isn’t Firearms—It’s Big Pharma. Support AbleChild’s 25-Year Battle

    The Real Link in Mass Shootings Isn’t Firearms—It’s Big Pharma. Support AbleChild’s 25-Year Battle

    You know the drill: Another tragedy hits the headlines, and within hours the talking heads are pointing fingers—at you, at your firearms, at the Second Amendment. They scream “gun control” while ignoring the elephant in the room: the psychological backgrounds and psychiatric drug regimens that show up again and again in these shooters.

    GunStuff TV’s frequent guest AbleChild has been relentlessly fighting to get to the bottom of this for the past 25 years. They’re a parent-led, non-profit powerhouse exposing how mental health “diagnoses” and mind-altering drugs are the common denominator in far too many mass shootings and acts of violence—not the tool, but the broken mind and the chemical cocktail behind it.

    They’ve dug into cases from Sandy Hook to Parkland and beyond, pushing for transparency, informed consent for parents, and laws that demand full disclosure of shooters’ mental health and drug histories. No more red herrings. No more scapegoating law-abiding gun owners like us.

    Now, AbleChild is celebrating their 25th Anniversary with a powerhouse event you won’t want to miss: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 – Stockholm Society, 230 Clematis Street, West Palm Beach, FL. VIP reception 5:00–6:00 PM EDT; main event 6:00–8:00 PM EDT. Expect cocktails, hors d’oeuvres, and an intimate evening of truth-telling featuring:

    Lara Logan (MC) • Stephen K. Bannon • James O’Keefe • Joe & Jim Hoft

    Master of Ceremonies: Lara Logan
    Featured Guests: Stephen K. Bannon, James O’Keefe, Joe Hoft, Jim Hoft

    This isn’t just a celebration—it’s a rallying cry for truth, parental rights, and accountability in the psycho-pharma world that’s infiltrated schools and lives. Hosted at the elegant Stockholm Society (members-only venue), it’s the perfect spot to connect with fellow advocates.

    GunStuff TV is proud to stand with organizations that cut through the noise and demand answers. I’ll be there in person to support AbleChild’s mission and connect with fellow patriots fighting the good fight. If you attend, come say hi—let’s talk about exposing the real culprits behind the violence narrative!

    That’s why we’re asking you to step up: Sponsor this landmark 25th Anniversary event and help power the next 25 years of exposing the truth. Your sponsorship supports:

    • Continued investigations into shooter backgrounds
    • Advocacy for laws requiring psychiatric drug/tox screens in violent crimes
    • Empowering parents to protect kids from harmful labeling and drugging
    • Keeping the fight alive against big pharma and bureaucratic overreach

    Email [email protected] for sponsorship details/packages. For full event info, tickets (if available), and more, visit AbleChild25.com or the official page: here.

    Don’t let the narrative keep blaming us. Help AbleChild shine a light on the real issues—mental health failures and dangerous drugs fueling violence.

    Together, we’re not just defending the 2A—we’re defending truth, kids, and sanity.

    Stay vigilant,
    Chris Swainhart
    Producer, GunStuff TV

    P.S. Check out the recent War Room discussion where AbleChild announced this event—proof they’re making waves: Watch here. And relive their many appearances on GunStuff TV here.

    P.P.S. Forward this to a fellow 2A supporter who’s fed up with the blame game. The more voices, the louder the truth.

    Thanks for being part of the GunStuff TV community.