California Gun Laws – GunStuff TV

Florida AG Sues Jacksonville for $5 Million Over Illegal Gun Owner Logbooks and Registry

Big news out of the Sunshine State that’s got gun owners smiling from Miami to Pensacola: Florida’s Attorney General James Uthmeier is swinging the hammer of justice against the City of Jacksonville, slapping them with a lawsuit that could cost them up to $5 million in civil penalties. The charge? Maintaining illegal lists of gun owners and their firearms at city security checkpoints—straight-up violations of Florida’s ironclad ban on firearm registries.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filing lawsuit against City of Jacksonville for illegal gun owner registries at security checkpoints (via firstcoastnews.com)

How Jacksonville Got Caught Red-Handed

It all boils down to Jacksonville’s overzealous security protocols at city facilities and events. For years, armed citizens—perfectly legal concealed carriers and open carriers exercising their God-given and constitutional rights—were forced to surrender their personal details and firearm serial numbers just to pass through metal detectors or attend public meetings. We’re talking names, addresses, make, model, and serial numbers scribbled into logbooks or entered into digital databases. Sound familiar? It’s the blueprint for a backdoor gun registry, the kind of Big Brother nonsense our Founding Fathers warned us about.

But Florida ain’t playing that game. State law, specifically Florida Statute 790.335, explicitly prohibits any government entity from creating or maintaining a registry of firearms or firearm owners. No lists. No databases. No exceptions. Jacksonville’s little hobby project? Dead to rights illegal. AG Uthmeier’s office uncovered this during an investigation sparked by complaints from—you guessed it—law-abiding gun owners who weren’t about to let their rights get trampled.

“The City of Jacksonville has knowingly violated Florida law by compiling and maintaining lists of law-abiding gun owners and their firearms,” Uthmeier stated in the lawsuit filing. “This illegal conduct ends now, and Jacksonville will be held accountable.”

That’s the kind of straight talk we love to hear from a top cop who’s got our backs.

Why Registries Are a Slippery Slope to Tyranny

Let’s cut through the fog: Gun registries aren’t about “safety.” They’re about control. History screams this truth from every corner. Nazi Germany used Weimar-era registration lists to confiscate firearms from Jews and political enemies. California’s massive registry has been a wish list for every anti-gun politician dreaming of door-to-door seizures. And don’t get me started on New York’s SAFE Act fiasco, where “secure” lists magically end up in the wrong hands.

In Florida, we fought tooth and nail to ban these lists precisely because we know what comes next: incremental erosion of the Second Amendment. One day it’s “just for security checkpoints,” the next it’s feeding data to the feds or local busybodies. Jacksonville’s stunt proves why vigilance is non-negotiable. These aren’t rogue mall cops; this was city policy, approved by bureaucrats who think they know better than the state legislature and the Constitution.

City of Jacksonville security checkpoint logbook recording gun owner details and firearm serial numbers in violation of Florida law (via floridapolitics.com)

A Win for the Second Amendment in the Culture War

This lawsuit isn’t just legalese—it’s a battle cry in the ongoing war for our rights. Under Governor Ron DeSantis, Florida has become a fortress for 2A freedoms: permitless carry, strong preemption laws, and now the AG cracking down on rogue cities. Uthmeier, stepping into the shoes of Ashley Moody, is continuing that legacy with zero tolerance for anti-gun shenanigans.

Jacksonville’s response so far? Crickets and excuses. They’ve reportedly started purging the lists (better late than never), but the damage is done. The suit demands not just the $5 million fine—which could sting the city’s wallet big time—but also an injunction to ensure this never happens again. And get this: Under Florida law, penalties can rack up to $5 million for willful violations. If proven, Jacksonville taxpayers might be footing the bill for their leaders’ folly.

What Gun Owners Can Do Right Now

1. Stay Informed: Follow updates on this case. GunStuff.tv will keep you posted—knowledge is power.

2. Speak Up: Contact your local officials. Remind them Florida’s preemption laws mean state law trumps city hall every time.

3. Carry On: Don’t let checkpoints intimidate you. Know your rights, politely assert them, and record interactions if needed.

4. Support the Fight: Back pro-2A leaders like DeSantis and Uthmeier at the ballot box. Donate to Second Amendment Foundation or Florida Carry for frontline legal battles.

This is what accountability looks like. Cities thinking they can play registry games on the down-low? Think again. Florida’s leading the charge, and with allies like AG Uthmeier, the Second Amendment is locked and loaded. Stay frosty, patriots—the right to keep and bear arms isn’t negotiable.

Want more pro-2A firepower? Check out our latest on permitless carry expansions and Supreme Court wins.

References

June 2, 2026

California Mandates Annual Training for Licensed Firearms Dealers and Employees Starting September 2026

As if California gun owners and dealers didn’t have enough hoops to jump through, Sacramento is cranking up the regulatory pressure once again. Starting with license renewals after September 1, 2026, every licensed firearms dealer and every employee who handles guns must complete a brand-new annual training course created by the state Department of Justice. The program will drill into topics spelled out in Penal Code section 26920 and wrap up with a required exam. Miss it, and your license renewal gets denied.

California firearms dealer and staff seated in a DOJ-mandated annual training classroom with instructor at front

This isn’t some minor paperwork update. It’s a fresh annual obligation layered on top of the already mountain of federal and state compliance that keeps honest FFLs in business. Dealers who have operated for years without incident now face extra time, extra cost, and another government-approved curriculum that will almost certainly lean heavily on restrictions rather than practical safety or marksmanship.

Proponents will claim the training improves public safety. Yet the data keeps showing that criminals ignore licensing rules entirely while law-abiding businesses and customers bear the burden. Every extra mandate raises overhead, which eventually shows up in higher prices at the counter and fewer small dealers willing or able to stay open in the state.

California’s track record of piling restrictions on the Second Amendment is well documented. From the assault weapons ban to the roster, magazine limits, and background-check expansions, each new rule chips away at access for responsible citizens. This latest training requirement fits the same pattern: dress it up as consumer protection while making it progressively harder for legal commerce to function.

Responsible gun owners and dealers already prioritize safety and legal compliance. They don’t need Sacramento bureaucrats adding another yearly box to check. The real effect of this law will likely be fewer retail options, longer wait times, and continued pressure on the right to keep and bear arms. Gun owners across the state should keep a close eye on implementation details and push back against further encroachments that treat legal firearms ownership as a problem to be managed rather than a right to be protected.

References

May 19, 2026

NSSF Slams The Trace for Blaming California Gun Store in Trump Assassination Attempt Coverage

Once again, the gun-grabbing media is at it, twisting facts to push their anti-Second Amendment agenda. This time, Bloomberg-funded outlet The Trace is shamelessly trying to shame a California gun store for legally selling firearms to the alleged Trump assassin. Enter the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), firing back with the truth bomb that exposes this as pure propaganda.

The Facts: Legal Sales in the Strictest Gun-Control State

Let’s get the details straight. Cole Tomas Allen, the man accused of attempting to assassinate President Trump, purchased a Mossberg shotgun and a pistol from Turner’s Outdoorsman, a reputable California gun retailer. Here’s the kicker: every single sale was 100% compliant with California’s draconian gun laws. We’re talking:

Universal background checks via NICS.
Required permits for handgun purchases.
Full 10-day waiting periods.
All federal and state paperwork properly completed.

California has some of the toughest gun laws in the nation—yet the system worked exactly as intended. No red flags, no violations. Turner’s did their job, followed the rules, and handed over legally purchased firearms to a buyer who passed every check. But does that stop The Trace from trying to crucify them? Not a chance.

NSSF Calls Out the Propaganda Machine

In a blistering statement, NSSF didn’t hold back: “The Trace‘s attempt to blame a licensed firearms retailer for the criminal actions of an individual is nothing more than anti-gun propaganda.” They pointed out that this is just the latest hit piece from a media outlet bankrolled by Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire gun-control crusader who’s poured millions into demonizing the firearms industry.

Why? Because facts don’t fit their narrative. When criminals break the law with legally obtained guns, it’s not a failure of the Second Amendment—it’s a failure of soft-on-crime policies that let dangerous people roam free. But blaming law-abiding retailers? That’s the playbook of those who want to confiscate your rights.

Turner's Outdoorsman storefront with Mossberg shotgun and pistol displayed, symbolizing legal firearm sales in California

Bloomberg’s Media Lapdogs vs. Real America

The Trace loves to paint gun stores as the villains, ignoring that places like Turner’s are pillars of their communities, serving hunters, sport shooters, and responsible owners. This isn’t journalism; it’s activism disguised as news. Bloomberg’s empire thrives on fearmongering, hoping you’ll buy into the lie that more laws (on top of California’s already suffocating regs) will stop criminals.

Newsflash: Criminals don’t follow laws. They steal guns, buy from black markets, or exploit failures in mental health and enforcement systems. What does work? A strong Second Amendment that arms the good guys.

Stand with NSSF and Pro-2A Retailers

Kudos to NSSF for defending the industry and shining a light on this nonsense. Support them by joining as a member, sharing their statement, and shopping at stores like Turner’s that stand tall against the attacks. The media war on our rights rages on, but with facts on our side, we’ll keep winning.

What do you think? Is The Trace just embarrassing themselves, or is this part of a bigger push? Drop your thoughts in the comments below and stay armed, informed, and unapologetic.

Stay vigilant, Second Amendment warriors.

References

May 17, 2026

Colorado Parks and Wildlife to Implement New Voluntary Semiautomatic Firearm Safety Training Program

Great news out of Colorado for responsible gun owners! In a move that underscores the Second Amendment community’s commitment to safety without government overreach, Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) is rolling out a brand-new voluntary semiautomatic firearm safety training program. This initiative, sparked by HB24-1353 passed in 2025, focuses on proper handling, storage, and transportation of semiautos—tools that millions of hunters and sport shooters rely on every season.

Why This Matters for 2A Supporters

Let’s be clear: this program is 100% voluntary, which is exactly how safety education should work in a free society. No mandates, no fines, no forced compliance—just an opportunity for law-abiding gun owners to sharpen their skills and shut down the anti-gunner narrative that we’re reckless with our firearms. CPW recognizes that hunters and shooters already prioritize safety, and this course builds on that foundation.

Developing now for a 2026 launch, the training will offer both online modules and in-person sessions. Expect practical, no-nonsense instruction covering:

Safe handling techniques for semiautomatic rifles and pistols.
Best practices for secure storage to prevent unauthorized access.
Legal and safe transportation methods, especially in vehicles during hunting trips.
Tailored advice for Colorado’s unique outdoor environments, from high-altitude mountains to dense forests.

It’s a smart play by CPW, partnering with experts to ensure the content is accurate and useful, not politicized drivel.

The Bigger Picture: Proactive Safety Wins

In a state that’s seen its share of misguided gun control pushes, this voluntary program is a breath of fresh air. It empowers everyday Americans—hunters tracking elk in the Rockies, competitive shooters at the range—to demonstrate unwavering responsibility. When we voluntarily seek out training like this, we starve the hoplophobes of their favorite ammo: the myth of the “irresponsible gun owner.”

Think about it: semiautomatic firearms are the workhorses of American hunting and self-defense. From AR-15 platforms varmint hunting to modern sporting rifles taking down coyotes, they’re safe, reliable, and effective in trained hands. This CPW course reinforces that truth.

Get Involved and Stay Ahead

Keep an eye on CPW’s website for updates on the 2026 rollout. Whether you’re a Colorado resident gearing up for big game season or just love hitting the range, sign up when it drops. Share this with your shooting buddies—let’s flood these classes and show the world what responsible 2A exercise looks like.

What do you think? Is voluntary training the gold standard, or should we push for even more industry-led programs? Drop your thoughts in the comments below, and stay locked in to GunStuff.tv for all the latest pro-2A updates!

References

May 13, 2026

Justice Department Sues Colorado Over Unconstitutional Assault Weapons Ban in Major 2A Enforcement Action

In a monumental victory for Second Amendment advocates, the U.S. Department of Justice has thrown down the gauntlet against Colorado’s overreaching assault weapons ban. This isn’t just another lawsuit—it’s a direct federal smackdown on state-level gun control that’s straight-up unconstitutional. Law-abiding gun owners across America are cheering as the DOJ steps up to defend our God-given right to keep and bear arms.

U.S. Department of Justice building with American flag and AR-15 rifle overlay, symbolizing federal enforcement of Second Amendment rights (via justice.gov)

The Lawsuit: DOJ Calls Out Colorado’s Assault Weapons Ban

Filing in federal court, the DOJ argues that Colorado’s ban on so-called “assault weapons”—modern semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15—infringes on the Second Amendment rights of ordinary citizens. These firearms are in common use for lawful purposes, including self-defense both inside and outside the home. Drawing straight from the Supreme Court’s landmark New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen decision, the complaint hammers home that such bans fail any historical tradition of firearm regulation.

“The Second Amendment protects the rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms that are commonly owned for self-defense,” the DOJ states in its filing. “Colorado’s ban sweeps too broadly, criminalizing arms that are overwhelmingly used responsibly by millions of Americans.”

This action comes after years of states like Colorado pushing extreme gun control measures in defiance of the Constitution. Colorado’s ban, passed amid emotional post-shooting legislation, prohibits standard-capacity magazines and popular rifles, treating them like machine guns from the 1930s rather than the workhorses of modern self-defense.

Why Colorado’s Ban is a Second Amendment Travesty

Let’s break it down: AR-15-style rifles aren’t “assault weapons” in any military sense—they’re semi-automatics that fire one round per trigger pull, just like your grandpa’s hunting rifle with a pistol grip. Owned by over 20 million Americans, they’re the most popular firearm in the country. The DOJ rightly points out that banning them is like banning trucks because some people use them for crime—absurd and unconstitutional.

Common Use Test: Post-Bruen, courts must ask if a firearm is in common use for lawful purposes. ARs? Check. Used by hunters, sport shooters, and homeowners defending their families.
No Historical Analogue: Gun grabbers can’t point to any 1791 or 1868 tradition of banning rifles like these. Founders carried muskets that were the “assault weapons” of their day.
Self-Defense Reality: In active shooter scenarios or home invasions, semi-auto rifles with 30-round mags give citizens a fighting chance against multiple threats.

Colorado’s law doesn’t just hurt owners; it endangers everyone by disarming the good guys. Sheriff departments across the state have already vowed not to enforce it, signaling widespread resistance from the front lines.

Civilian holding AR-15 rifle in home defense stance, with Colorado state outline in background and '2A Protected' text overlay — Civilian holding AR-15 rifle in home defense stance, with Colorado state outline in background and ‘2A Protected’ text overlay (via notus.org)

A Game-Changer for National 2A Enforcement

This isn’t the Biden DOJ we’re used to seeing—this feels like a return to constitutional sanity. Whether driven by recent court smackdowns or a shift in priorities, it’s a massive W for the gun community. States like California, New York, and Illinois should be sweating; if Colorado’s ban crumbles, their house-of-cards restrictions are next.

“The Department of Justice will not stand idly by while states trample the Bill of Rights. This lawsuit enforces the Supreme Court’s clear directive: The Second Amendment means what it says.” — U.S. Attorney General (paraphrased from filing)

Pro-2A heroes like the NRA and GOA have long fought these bans in court, racking up wins in places like Maryland and Illinois. But federal intervention supercharges the effort, potentially fast-tracking this to the Supreme Court for nationwide relief.

What This Means for You, the Everyday Patriot

If you’re in Colorado, keep your rifle locked and loaded (legally, of course)—this suit buys time and momentum. Nationwide, it’s a reminder: Our rights aren’t negotiable. Anti-gunners rely on emotion and bans; we rely on the Constitution and cold, hard facts showing armed citizens stop crime 94% of the time (per studies from the Crime Prevention Research Center).

Don’t just celebrate—get involved. Join your state 2A group, support FPC or USCCA lawsuits, and vote out the tyrants pushing confiscation. The DOJ’s move proves the tide is turning: The right to self-defense is winning.

Stay armed, stay informed, and stay free. Follow GunStuff.tv for the latest 2A news that’ll keep you ahead of the curve.

References

May 12, 2026

Massachusetts Rolls Out Mandatory Expanded Firearms Training Under New 2024 Gun Safety Law

Massachusetts gun owners, brace yourselves: the Bay State’s latest assault on your Second Amendment rights is gearing up for a 2026 rollout. Under the deceptively named “2024 Gun Safety Law,” all new and renewing firearms license applicants will be forced to complete an expanded basic firearms safety course. That’s right—even if you’ve safely owned and carried firearms for decades, you’ll need to jump through these new hoops to exercise your God-given right to self-defense.

Image via wbur.org

The Devil’s in the Details: What’s New in This Mandatory Training?

Effective April 2, 2026, this isn’t your grandpa’s quick safety orientation. The curriculum has ballooned to include:

Live-fire exercises: Hands-on shooting, which sounds fine on paper—but who pays for the range time, ammo, and instructor fees?
Suicide prevention: Noble goal, but why punish all gun owners for a mental health crisis that needs better solutions than firearm restrictions?
De-escalation tactics and use of force: Training that mimics cop academy stuff, turning civilians into armchair lawyers before they can defend themselves.
Safe storage: More lectures on locks and safes, ignoring that responsible owners already prioritize this.
Written exam: A test to prove you absorbed the government’s wisdom. Fail? Kiss your license goodbye.

Proponents claim this boosts “readiness,” but let’s call it what it is: a blatant barrier to entry. Law-abiding citizens in Massachusetts already face some of the nation’s strictest licensing, background checks, and “may-issue” permitting. Now, they’re piling on more requirements for renewals every six years. That’s not safety—it’s suppression.

Who Does This Really Hurt? Hardworking Folks, Not Criminals

Think about it: the gangbanger in Boston’s streets doesn’t care about a safety course or a written exam. Criminals bypass the system entirely, using stolen guns or black-market buys. This law targets you—the single mom needing protection, the hunter providing for his family, the veteran who’s safer with a firearm than without.

Costs are skyrocketing too. Expect to shell out hundreds for certified instructors, range fees, and travel to approved locations. For rural Massachusetts residents, that’s hours on the road. And renewals? If you’re like the average LTC holder renewing every six years, you’re looking at repeating this circus indefinitely. It’s a poll tax on your rights, plain and simple.

The Slippery Slope: From Training to Total Control

This isn’t Massachusetts’ first rodeo. Remember the 1998 ban? Assault weapons restrictions? Red flag laws? Each “safety” measure chips away at the Second Amendment. Now, with live-fire mandates and psych eval-lite topics like suicide prevention, they’re inching toward psych evaluations for all applicants. What’s next—annual psych tests? Home inspections?

Studies show mandatory training doesn’t reduce crime. Look at states like Connecticut or New York with similar hurdles: their violent crime rates dwarf shall-issue havens like Texas or Florida. Real safety comes from armed, trained citizens—not disarmed subjects begging for permits.

And get this: even the live-fire component, which 2A supporters might applaud, is a Trojan horse. It centralizes control, dictating how you train under state-approved eyes. Private range time won’t cut it; it must be this specific course.

Fighting Back: Your Rights Aren’t Negotiable

The good news? The fight’s just beginning. Gun rights groups like GOAL (Gun Owners’ Action League) are mobilizing lawsuits and lobbying hard. Debates are raging in forums, town halls, and the State House—proving everyday Americans won’t roll over.

Here’s what you can do today:

Contact your legislators: Flood their inboxes demanding repeal. Find them at malegislature.gov.
Join GOAL or the NRA: Support orgs battling in court and the Capitol.
Train anyway: Don’t let mandates stop you. Hit your local range, take voluntary advanced courses—be the best-armed citizen possible.
Speak out: Share this post, hit social media with #MA2A and #RepealGunControl.

Massachusetts may be the cradle of liberty, but it’s become a nanny state nightmare. This 2024 law isn’t about safety—it’s about control. Stand firm, 2A patriots. Our forebears spilled blood for these rights; we won’t let bureaucrats bury them under paperwork and tests.

Image via spectrumnews1.com

Stay vigilant, stay armed, stay free.

References

April 28, 2026

California Concedes Youth Firearms Marketing Law Unconstitutional in Major 2A Victory

In a stunning reversal that sends shockwaves through the gun-grabbers’ playbook, California—the self-proclaimed epicenter of anti-2A extremism—has officially thrown in the towel on AB 2571. This draconian law, which sought to muzzle firearm advertising and marketing aimed at anyone under 18, has been deemed unconstitutional under both the First and Second Amendments. After four grueling years of litigation spearheaded by the Sportsmen’s Alliance Foundation (SAF), the Golden State has agreed not to enforce it and will foot the bill for attorney fees. That’s right, folks: another massive victory for our rights!

The Birth of a Bad Law

AB 2571 was the latest in California’s endless crusade to demonize firearms and erode our freedoms. Passed in 2019, it banned manufacturers, distributors, and retailers from “knowingly or recklessly” marketing guns to minors. On the surface, it sounded like a noble effort to “protect the children,” but dig deeper, and it was a blatant assault on free speech and the right to bear arms. The law’s vague language could have criminalized everything from hunting magazines to video game ads featuring rifles—anything that might appeal to young shooters learning the family tradition.

Enter the Sportsmen’s Alliance Foundation, who weren’t about to let this slide. In 2020, SAF filed suit on behalf of the California Rifle & Pistol Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation, arguing that the law violated the First Amendment’s protection of commercial speech and the Second Amendment’s core right to keep and bear arms. Federal courts agreed to hear the case, and the battle was on.

Four Years of Fighting the Good Fight

This wasn’t a quick knockout; it was a heavyweight bout. SAF pushed through motions, hearings, and appeals, chipping away at the state’s flimsy arguments. California doubled down, as they always do, painting gun owners as reckless enablers of youth violence. But the facts—and the Constitution—prevailed.

In a pivotal move, the state conceded in federal court last week, stipulating that AB 2571 is indeed unconstitutional. No more enforcement. No more threats to businesses. And yes, they’ll pay up those legal fees, estimated in the six figures. This isn’t just a win for SAF; it’s a blueprint for dismantling similar nanny-state nonsense across the country.

Why This Matters for Every 2A Patriot

Let’s be clear: AB 2571 wasn’t about safety; it was about control. By targeting marketing, California aimed to sever the next generation from their firearms heritage—hunting, sport shooting, self-defense training. Imagine telling Nike they can’t advertise sneakers to kids or Apple banning iPhone ads for teens. Absurd, right? The First Amendment doesn’t play favorites, and neither does the Second.

This victory reinforces Bruen and Heller: governments can’t invent restrictions on our rights under the guise of “public safety.” It’s a reminder that even in the bluest of blue states, persistence pays off. Gun rights organizations like SAF are on the front lines, turning back the tide one lawsuit at a time.

What’s Next? Keep the Momentum Rolling

California still has a laundry list of unconstitutional gun laws in its arsenal, from mag bans to roster restrictions. But cracks are showing. With allies like the NRA, GOA, and FPC stacking wins nationwide, the anti-2A house of cards is wobbling.

Support the fighters: Donate to SAF, join your local 2A group, and stay vigilant. Share this story far and wide—let the world know that freedom isn’t negotiable. In the words of the Founders, our rights are unalienable. California just got a painful reminder.

Stay armed, stay free.

References

April 28, 2026

Tag: California Gun Laws

How Jacksonville Got Caught Red-Handed

Why Registries Are a Slippery Slope to Tyranny

A Win for the Second Amendment in the Culture War

What Gun Owners Can Do Right Now

References

References

The Facts: Legal Sales in the Strictest Gun-Control State

NSSF Calls Out the Propaganda Machine

Bloomberg’s Media Lapdogs vs. Real America

Stand with NSSF and Pro-2A Retailers

References

Why This Matters for 2A Supporters

The Bigger Picture: Proactive Safety Wins

Get Involved and Stay Ahead

References

The Lawsuit: DOJ Calls Out Colorado’s Assault Weapons Ban

Why Colorado’s Ban is a Second Amendment Travesty

A Game-Changer for National 2A Enforcement

What This Means for You, the Everyday Patriot

References

The Devil’s in the Details: What’s New in This Mandatory Training?

Who Does This Really Hurt? Hardworking Folks, Not Criminals

The Slippery Slope: From Training to Total Control

Fighting Back: Your Rights Aren’t Negotiable

References

The Birth of a Bad Law

Four Years of Fighting the Good Fight

Why This Matters for Every 2A Patriot

What’s Next? Keep the Momentum Rolling

References