Tag: FPC

  • Registration Opens for 41st Annual Gun Rights Policy Conference in 2026

    Registration Opens for 41st Annual Gun Rights Policy Conference in 2026

    Second Amendment advocates, mark your calendars and prepare for an unmissable gathering of minds dedicated to preserving our constitutional freedoms. Registration has officially opened for the 41st Annual Gun Rights Policy Conference, set for September 2026 in sunny Phoenix, Arizona. This milestone event promises to be a powerhouse of strategy sessions, legal updates, and grassroots tactics that keep the fight for gun rights alive and winning.

    Spacious conference hall in Phoenix filled with engaged attendees discussing Second Amendment issues at the GRPC

    Building on the landmark Bruen decision, this year’s conference dives deep into post-Bruen litigation strategies that have already toppled unconstitutional restrictions nationwide. Attendees will explore how to leverage these victories in courtrooms from coast to coast while pushing back against new threats from anti-gun lawmakers. Expect candid discussions on state-level reforms that empower law-abiding citizens, from constitutional carry expansions to protections for the firearm industry.

    Who You’ll Meet and What You’ll Learn

    Top-tier attorneys from groups like the Second Amendment Foundation and the Firearms Policy Coalition will share insider updates on emerging legal challenges. Second Amendment scholars will break down the latest court rulings, while lawmakers and grassroots organizers reveal proven tactics for mobilizing communities and influencing policy at every level. Whether you’re a seasoned activist or new to the movement, the sessions will arm you with actionable tools to defend our rights against overreach.

    Phoenix provides the perfect backdrop for this gathering, blending Western heritage with a strong pro-2A community. From networking mixers to late-night strategy huddles, the event fosters connections that turn ideas into real-world impact. Past conferences have sparked major lawsuits and legislative wins—2026 promises even more.

    Why This Matters Now More Than Ever

    With elections looming and fresh attacks on our freedoms surfacing daily, staying informed isn’t optional—it’s essential. The GRPC equips you to counter narratives, support industry allies, and build coalitions that outlast any temporary political setback. Pro-2A voices thrive when we unite, and this conference is where that unity gets forged.

    Don’t wait to secure your spot. Head over to the official site and register today to join fellow patriots shaping the future of gun rights. Together, we’ll keep the flame of liberty burning bright for generations to come.

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • Firearms Policy Coalition and SAF Back Lawsuit Challenging California’s 11% Excise Tax on Guns and Ammo as Second Amendment Violation

    California’s relentless war on the Second Amendment just got another legal smackdown in the works, and we’re here for it. Poway Weapons & Gear, the brave retailer standing tall against Sacramento’s overreach, has teamed up with the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) to file a motion for preliminary injunction against the state’s insidious 11% excise tax on firearms and ammunition sales. This isn’t just about taxes—it’s a direct assault on our fundamental right to keep and bear arms.

    Exterior of Poway Weapons & Gear store with American flags and pro-2A signage, symbolizing resistance to California's gun taxes
    Exterior of Poway Weapons & Gear store with American flags and pro-2A signage, symbolizing resistance to California’s gun taxes (via abc10.com)

    The Tax That Punishes Your Rights

    Proposition 63 and AB 28 shoved this 11% tax down the throats of gun owners and retailers starting January 2024, funneling millions into the state’s general fund under the guise of “public safety.” But let’s call it what it is: a discriminatory cash grab targeting law-abiding citizens who exercise their constitutional rights. The lawsuit argues—and we agree—that this tax unconstitutionally burdens the Second Amendment by making self-defense tools and training ammo prohibitively expensive.

    Poway Weapons & Gear reports a staggering 25% drop in sales since the tax hit, forcing cutbacks and threatening closures. This isn’t hypothetical; it’s real-world destruction of businesses that serve armed citizens. The suit invokes the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, demanding strict scrutiny for any law infringing on core Second Amendment conduct. California’s tax fails that test spectacularly, discriminating against gun dealers while sparing other retailers.

    Court Battle Heats Up

    A federal judge in Sacramento is now weighing the state’s motion to dismiss, with Poway’s opposition due in June 2026. That’s right—2026. California’s bureaucracy moves at a glacial pace, but FPC and SAF aren’t backing down. They’ve got the receipts: economic data showing the tax’s chilling effect, historical analysis proving taxes were never used this way against arms pre-20th century, and ironclad constitutional arguments.

    Firearms Policy Coalition and Second Amendment Foundation lawyers filing motion against California excise tax, with 2A flags and documents
    Firearms Policy Coalition and Second Amendment Foundation lawyers filing motion against California excise tax, with 2A flags and documents (via firearmspolicy.org)

    Why This Matters to Every Gun Owner

    If California gets away with this, expect copycats nationwide. Sin taxes on guns and ammo set a dangerous precedent, turning a right into a government privilege you pay extra for. Remember Bruen? The Founders didn’t embed excise taxes into the Bill of Rights. This is modern-day taxation without representation, aimed squarely at disarming the populace.

    FPC and SAF are the tip of the spear in this fight, and they’ve racked up win after win—from striking down assault weapon bans to gutting red flag laws. Poway Weapons & Gear isn’t just a plaintiff; they’re a frontline defender keeping guns in the hands of Californians despite the onslaught.

    Stand with the 2A Warriors

    Gun owners, this is your call to action. Chip in to FPC and SAF today. Follow the case, share this post, and gear up—because when they come for the Second Amendment in California, they’re coming for all of us next. Victory is coming; let’s make it swift.

    Stay armed, stay free.

    Join the Fight - Second Amendment Foundation

    References

  • Lawsuit Challenges Federal Ban on Firearms in National Park Buildings

    Lawsuit Challenges Federal Ban on Firearms in National Park Buildings

    Imagine this: You’re hiking through the majestic beauty of a national park, your concealed carry permit valid in your home state, ready to protect yourself and your family from wildlife threats or the rare criminal element. But when you step into a visitor center for a map or souvenir, suddenly you’re disarmed by federal fiat. Sound unconstitutional? It is—and two powerhouse Second Amendment organizations are fighting back with a blockbuster lawsuit.The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) have filed a federal lawsuit in Texas court against the National Park Service (NPS) rules that ban firearms in park buildings like visitor centers, gift shops, and museums—regardless of state law. Plaintiff Gary Zimmerman, a law-abiding gun owner, is leading the charge, arguing that this arbitrary ban crushes his Second Amendment rights, especially after the Supreme Court’s landmark N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen decision in 2022.
    Lawsuit Challenges Federal Ban on Firearms in National Park Buildings

    The Unconstitutional Overreach

    NPS regulations (36 C.F.R. § 2.4(b)) prohibit carrying firearms inside “federal facilities” within national parks, even if you’re legally allowed to carry concealed everywhere else in the state. This means no sidearm in the visitor center while grizzlies roam nearby or sketchy individuals lurk. Zimmerman’s suit contends this violates Bruen‘s clear mandate: Gun laws must align with our nation’s “historical tradition of firearm regulation.” Where’s the history of disarming citizens in government gift shops?

    “The Second Amendment doesn’t take a coffee break at the park entrance,” said SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “Law-abiding Americans have the right to self-defense everywhere they’re lawfully present—not just on hiking trails.”

    FPC echoes this, slamming the rule as “sensitive places” nonsense without historical backing. Post-Bruen, courts are striking down gun-free zones left and right. Why should national park bathrooms get a pass?

    Why National Parks Need Armed Citizens

    • Wildlife Threats: Bears, mountain lions, and rattlesnakes don’t respect “no guns” signs. Your permit isn’t for show.
    • Crime Hotspots: Parks see theft, assaults, and worse. Disarming visitors creates soft targets.
    • State Sovereignty: If Texas or Montana says you can carry, DC bureaucrats shouldn’t override it.

    This lawsuit builds on momentum from recent wins, like challenges to Post Office and VA facility bans. Coverage exploded this week as pro-2A outlets highlight the broader push for concealed carry in federal spaces. It’s time to reclaim our rights from the nanny state.

    Stand with SAF and FPC

    Support the fight: Donate to SAF and FPC, follow case updates, and exercise your 2A rights where legal. Shall not be infringed means everywhere—even in the park store.

    Stay strapped, stay safe, and stay free.