GunStuff TV

Author: Katie Derrick

  • Federal Judge Denies DOJ Motion to Limit Post Office Firearms Carry Victory

    Federal Judge Denies DOJ Motion to Limit Post Office Firearms Carry Victory

    Big Win for Gun Owners: Federal Judge Slaps Down DOJ’s Sneaky Attempt to Gut Post Office Carry Victory!

    In a ruling that’s got Second Amendment advocates cheering from coast to coast, a federal judge in Texas just delivered a resounding smackdown to the Department of Justice. The DOJ tried to slinkily limit a hard-fought injunction against the U.S. Postal Service’s idiotic ban on carrying firearms in post office parking lots and facilities. Judge Alan Albright said “NOPE” and extended those protections to all current and future members of the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Second Amendment Foundation (SAF)—not just the original plaintiffs. This is a massive affirmation of our God-given right to keep and bear arms, even on federal turf!

    Federal judge's gavel striking down on a USPS no-guns sign, symbolizing victory for Second Amendment rights in post office parking lots

    The Backstory: USPS Tries to Play Gun Grabber

    It all stems from FPC v. Bondi and related SAF cases, where law-abiding gun owners challenged the Postal Service’s blanket prohibition on carrying firearms—open or concealed—in post office parking lots and buildings. We’re talking about folks just trying to mail a package, drop off a letter, or pick up their mail, not staging a Wild West showdown. The USPS policy treated every armed citizen like a criminal, ignoring that these are parking lots open to the public, just like Walmarts or Starbucks.

    FPC and SAF sued, arguing this was blatant Second Amendment infringement. And they won! An initial injunction blocked the ban for the plaintiffs. But the DOJ, in classic Big Brother fashion, filed a motion to narrow that victory, trying to keep it limited to just those specific folks and dodge broader accountability.

    Judge Albright Draws the Line: “Not on My Watch”

    Enter U.S. District Judge Alan D. Albright, who wasn’t having any of it. In his order denying the DOJ’s motion, the judge made it crystal clear: the injunction now covers every member of FPC and SAF, past, present, and future. No more bureaucratic loopholes. He emphasized that the Second Amendment doesn’t stop at the post office door—or parking spot.

    “The relief sought by Plaintiffs is not limited to the named individuals but extends to all members of the organizations, ensuring that the Second Amendment protections are not undermined by arbitrary limitations.” — Paraphrased from Judge Albright’s ruling

    This isn’t just a technical win; it’s a blueprint for dismantling government overreach everywhere. The judge saw through the DOJ’s games and stood firm for the people.

    American flag waving over a post office parking lot with a holstered firearm on a car seat, representing expanded Second Amendment rights

    Why This Matters for Every Gun Owner

    Think about it: Post offices are everywhere. Millions of us interact with them weekly. If the feds can ban carry there, what’s next? Grocery store lots? Public parks? This ruling sends a message: Your rights travel with you. It’s a direct rebuke to the administrative state that’s been chipping away at the Bill of Rights for decades.

    Plus, by extending to all members (and future ones), FPC and SAF become even stronger shields for everyday Americans. Join ’em if you haven’t—strength in numbers!

    DOJ and USPS: Time to Get the Message

    The DOJ’s loss here exposes their desperation. They know the tide is turning post-Bruen. Courts are finally enforcing the Second Amendment as an individual right that applies outside the home. USPS, drop the nanny-state nonsense and focus on delivering mail, not disarming citizens.

    Gun owners, this is your victory. Celebrate it, share it, and keep fighting. The Second Amendment isn’t negotiable—it’s eternal.

    Stay armed, stay informed, and support the orgs making it happen: FPC and SAF. What’s your take on this ruling? Drop a comment below!

    Follow GunStuff.tv for more pro-2A wins and updates.

    Join the Fight

    References

  • Pennsylvania Game Commission Approves Final 2026-27 Hunting Seasons and Bag Limits

    Pennsylvania Game Commission Approves Final 2026-27 Hunting Seasons and Bag Limits

    Great news for Pennsylvania hunters! On April 11, 2026, the Pennsylvania Board of Game Commissioners gave the green light to the final 2026-27 hunting and trapping seasons and bag limits. This approval is a win for sportsmen and women across the Commonwealth, expanding opportunities to get out in the field, put meat in the freezer, and exercise our God-given right to hunt—a cornerstone of Second Amendment freedoms.

    A Pennsylvania hunter in camouflage aiming a rifle at a whitetail deer during the regular firearms season in a snowy woodland.

    Expanded Sunday Hunting: More Time to Hunt, Less Restrictions

    One of the biggest highlights? Expanded Sunday hunting across most seasons. That’s right—Pennsylvania is opening up more days for you to hit the woods or fields without the old blue laws holding you back. Whether you’re chasing whitetails, turkeys, or small game, those extra opportunities mean more time bonding with family, honing your marksmanship, and living the self-reliant American way. This move respects hunters’ schedules and recognizes hunting as a vital tradition, not a hobby squeezed into weekends.

    Statewide Regular Firearms Deer Season: Classic Dates with Solid Limits

    The regular firearms deer season runs statewide from November 30 to December 13—a solid two-week window perfect for Thanksgiving feasts stocked with your own venison. Bag limits stay hunter-friendly: one antlered and one antlerless deer per license. No more patchwork regional rules complicating your plans. Load up your trusty bolt-action or lever gun, zero in those sights, and make the most of it. This season structure balances population management with ample hunting access, ensuring healthy herds for generations.

    Deer hunting isn’t just sport; it’s conservation in action. By harvesting ethically with modern firearms, we’re controlling overpopulation that leads to crop damage and vehicle collisions. Pro-2A folks know this: our rights protect wildlife too.

    A group of diverse Pennsylvania hunters, including families, enjoying Sunday hunting on public land with rifles and shotguns.

    Small Game and Furbearer Tweaks to Boost Participation

    The Commission also fine-tuned small game and furbearer seasons to encourage more participation and better manage populations. Expect adjustments that make it easier for newbies to get involved—think extended seasons for squirrels, rabbits, and pheasants, plus flexible trapping options for coyotes and foxes. These changes are smart biology meets practical policy, drawing more folks into the shooting sports and building a stronger base of responsible gun owners.

    • Squirrels: Extended youth and adult seasons for family outings.
    • Rabbits and Grouse: Optimized dates to match peak populations.
    • Furbearers: Night hunting expansions for predators keeping deer herds in check.

    These aren’t arbitrary; they’re data-driven decisions that keep Pennsylvania’s outdoor heritage thriving. And with more hunters afield, we’re all safer—armed citizens who know their tools and respect the land.

    Why This Matters for 2A Patriots

    In a world pushing anti-gun narratives, victories like these remind us why the Second Amendment endures. Hunting seasons aren’t just dates on a calendar; they’re affirmations of our rights to bear arms, defend our families, and sustain ourselves. Pennsylvania’s Board of Game Commissioners deserves kudos for listening to hunters and prioritizing access over bureaucracy.

    Mark your calendars, gear up your favorites from the GunStuff.tv shop, and get ready for an epic 2026-27 season. Stay vigilant, stay armed, and keep fighting for our freedoms. What’s your must-have hunt this year? Drop a comment below!

    Map of Pennsylvania highlighting 2026-27 hunting zones, Sunday hunting expansions, and key deer season dates.

    Join the Fight

    References

  • Supreme Court Wrestles with Federal Gun Ban for Marijuana Users Under Second Amendment Scrutiny

    Supreme Court Wrestles with Federal Gun Ban for Marijuana Users Under Second Amendment Scrutiny

    In a blockbuster showdown at the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment is flexing its muscles against one of the most absurd federal gun bans out there: the prohibition on firearm ownership for anyone who uses marijuana—even in states where it’s totally legal. That’s right, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) treats a puff of legal weed like you’re a dangerous felon, stripping your gun rights under the guise of the Gun Control Act of 1968. But post-New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), the justices are grilling lawyers on whether this nonsense has any roots in our nation’s history. Spoiler: It doesn’t.

    U.S. Supreme Court justices during oral arguments on Second Amendment case challenging federal gun ban for marijuana users.

    The Case at Hand: Weed Smokers vs. the Feds

    This isn’t some hypothetical. Take guys like Bryan Harrison from Texas or Zackey Rahimi—wait, Rahimi’s a different beast, but the principle echoes. In the spotlight is a challenge to §922(g)(3), which bars “unlawful users of or addicted to any controlled substance” from possessing firearms. Marijuana’s still Schedule I federally, so even if your state says “light up,” Uncle Sam says “no guns for you.”

    The Fifth Circuit struck down the ban for one defendant, ruling it violated Bruen’s test: Modern gun laws must be “consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” No Founding-era equivalent exists for banning guns based on substance use. Booze? Heck, the Founders loved their ale. Opium dens in the 1800s? Gun-toting patrons aplenty. The government scrambled for “analogues” like 19th-century laws against “habitual drunkards,” but even Justice Kavanaugh poked holes: “Alcohol was ubiquitous then; drugs weren’t regulated like today.”

    During oral arguments, the Court wrestled with this. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar defended the ban, claiming it’s about public safety—users might be impaired. But Justice Gorsuch fired back: “What about alcohol? We don’t disarm everyone who drinks.” Justice Barrett questioned if “unlawful user” is even clear—self-certify on Form 4473? Justice Jackson worried about kids with ADHD meds. The skepticism was thick; even liberal justices seemed uneasy with the breadth.

    Bruen’s Shadow Looms Large

    Bruen flipped the script on gun control. No more “interest balancing” or “means-end scrutiny.” Show us the history, or pack it up. For §922(g)(3), the feds’ historical grab-bag is pathetic:

    • Drunkard laws: Sure, some states disarmed “habitual drunkards” in the 1800s, but alcohol was legal and culturally accepted. Marijuana? Criminalized in the 20th century via racist drug wars.
    • Mental health commitments: Irrelevant—pot use isn’t a mental defect.
    • Lunacy laws: Colonial holdovers for the truly dangerous, not casual users.

    Justice Thomas, a 2A rockstar, likely sees through it. The historical record shows the Second Amendment protected arms for the “virtuous citizen,” but “virtue” meant law-abiding, not substance-free. Post-Prohibition, we didn’t ban guns for beer drinkers. This is a modern invention, born from the War on Drugs, not the Founding.

    Why This Matters for Every Gun Owner

    Don’t think this is just for stoners. Slippery slope alert: If the feds can disarm you for legal weed, what’s next? CBD oil? Prescription painkillers? Hell, caffeine addicts? This ban affects millions—over 50 million Americans have tried pot, and 18 states plus D.C. have legalized recreational use. Yet ATF Form 4473 asks if you’re an “unlawful user,” and lying is a felony.

    Pro-2A warriors like the Firearms Policy Coalition and Second Amendment Foundation are leading the charge. They’ve won at lower courts, forcing SCOTUS to confront Bruen’s bite. A ruling striking this down would shred another §922(g) prohibitor, paving the way for challenges to felon-in-possession (g(1)), domestic violence (g(9)), and more.

    Shifting drug laws amplify the farce. As states nullify federal pot prohibition, why should 2A rights suffer? The Founders didn’t envision a nanny state disarming based on FDA schedules. This is peak federal overreach.

    What Happens Next?

    Decision expected by summer 2025. If SCOTUS guts §922(g)(3), expect fireworks: ATF in chaos, states celebrating, gun grabbers wailing. Even if narrowed (say, only for “addicts”), it’s a win—further eroding Biden’s gun control empire.

    Gun owners, stay vigilant. Support orgs fighting these battles. Write your reps demanding full repeal of 922(g). The Second Amendment isn’t conditional on your vices—it’s absolute.

    Shall not be infringed. Period.

    Stay armed, stay free. Follow GunStuff.tv for more 2A firepower.
    Join the Fight

    References

  • U.S. House Removes Anti-Hunting Language from Farm Bill in Victory for Hunters and 2A Supporters

    U.S. House Removes Anti-Hunting Language from Farm Bill in Victory for Hunters and 2A Supporters

    In a massive win for hunters, sportsmen, and Second Amendment defenders across America, the U.S. House of Representatives has officially axed sneaky anti-hunting language from the Farm, Food and National Security Act of 2026 (H.R. 7567). This garbage provision originated in the so-called Greyhound Protection Act of 2025 (H.R. 5017), and it was primed to slam the door on traditional hunting practices that generations of Americans have cherished.

    U.S. House Representatives celebrating the removal of anti-hunting provisions, with hunters and hounds in the foreground symbolizing preserved traditions.

    Let’s break it down: the targeted measures were dangerously vague, banning “hound hunting,” field trials for hunting dogs, and even live-lure training for bird dogs. These weren’t protections for animals—they were backdoor attacks on our hunting heritage, disguised as feel-good legislation. Imagine telling law-abiding hunters they couldn’t use their trusted hounds to track game or train retrievers the old-school way. It’s the kind of nanny-state overreach that starts with “protecting” one breed and ends with gutting your right to bear arms for self-defense, sport, and sustenance.

    Leadership That Delivers: Chairman Thompson Takes the Lead

    Credit where it’s due—House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn Thompson (R-PA) led the charge like a true champion of rural America. Under his guidance, the House stripped these provisions clean out of the bill, ensuring it moves forward without hamstringing sportsmen. Thompson and his allies recognized this for what it was: an assault on the Second Amendment-adjacent rights that keep our hunting culture alive. Firearms, ammo, and the tools of the trade? All safer now from bureaucratic busybodies.

    This isn’t just a procedural win; it’s a statement. Anti-gun extremists love to chip away at our freedoms through unrelated bills like farm legislation. But patriots in Congress drew the line, protecting not only hound hunters and bird dog trainers but every gun owner who values the outdoors.

    Group of hunters with hounds in a misty field at dawn, rifles slung over shoulders, embodying American hunting tradition.

    Why This Victory Matters for 2A Warriors

    • Preserves Heritage: Hound hunting and field trials aren’t cruelty—they’re time-tested methods that sustain wildlife management and pass down skills father to son (or daughter).
    • Blocks the Slippery Slope: Vague bans today become outright gun grabs tomorrow. If they can regulate your dog’s training, what’s next—your AR-15 for “hunting”?
    • Empowers Law-Abiding Citizens: Sportsmen aren’t criminals; we’re the backbone of conservation, funding habitats through licenses and excise taxes on guns and ammo.

    The Farm Bill now stands stronger, focused on food security and national priorities without the anti-hunting poison pill. But don’t pop the champagne just yet—this fight’s part of a bigger war against those who want to disarm America one “protection” at a time.

    Stay Locked and Loaded: What You Can Do

    Hunters and 2A supporters, this is your reminder to stay vigilant. Contact your reps, support orgs like the NRA, Safari Club International, and the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation that fought tooth and nail here. Share this story, hit the range, and hunt on—your rights are worth defending.

    America’s hunting grounds remain open, our hounds baying free, and our Second Amendment ironclad. Victory!

    Join The Fight

    References

  • D.C. Court of Appeals Strikes Down Ban on Large-Capacity Magazines as Unconstitutional

    D.C. Court of Appeals Strikes Down Ban on Large-Capacity Magazines as Unconstitutional

    In a resounding victory for law-abiding gun owners everywhere, the District of Columbia’s Court of Appeals has just delivered a knockout punch to the city’s tyrannical ban on so-called “large-capacity” magazines. That’s right—magazines holding more than 10 rounds are now officially protected under the Second Amendment, and a wrongful conviction has been tossed out like yesterday’s hoplophobe talking points.

    The Case That Cracked the Nut

    At the heart of this decision is the story of a D.C. resident who faced prosecution simply for possessing magazines that hold more than 10 rounds—standard equipment for most modern defensive firearms. The court didn’t mince words: these magazines are “arms” protected by the Second Amendment. Reversing the lower court’s conviction, the appeals panel ruled that D.C.’s ban fails the post-New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen test, which demands that gun restrictions be rooted in our nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.

    Bruen, decided by the Supreme Court in 2022, flipped the script on gun control activism by rejecting subjective “balancing tests” and interest-balancing in favor of history and tradition. D.C.’s magazine ban? No historical analogue. Zip. Zero. Nada. Judges recognized that limiting magazines to 10 rounds is an arbitrary modern invention, not some sacred founding-era principle.

    “The District’s large-capacity magazine ban is inconsistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation and therefore violates the Second Amendment.” — D.C. Court of Appeals

    Why Standard-Capacity Mags Matter

    Let’s be real: in a self-defense scenario, fumbling with reloads while some dirtbag is charging you isn’t a Hollywood slow-mo—it’s a nightmare. Standard-capacity magazines (what the gun-grabbers sneeringly call “high-capacity”) give you the firepower edge you need without relying on perfect aim under stress. They’re not for spray-and-pray mall rampages; they’re for protecting your family when seconds count.

    This ruling affirms what we’ve known all along: magazines are arms. They’re integral components of the firearms our Founders enshrined in the Bill of Rights. D.C., the self-proclaimed epicenter of nanny-state overreach, just got schooled on the Constitution.

    Ripple Effects Nationwide

    This isn’t just a D.C. win—it’s a blueprint for dismantling similar bans in places like California, New York, New Jersey, and beyond. Post-Bruen, courts from coast to coast have been striking down mag limits, ghost gun rules, and assault weapon bans. Remember Duncan v. Bonta in California? That Ninth Circuit smackdown on the state’s mag ban is heading to the Supreme Court, and decisions like this one pile on the pressure.

    • California: 10-round limit challenged and crumbling.
    • New York: SAFE Act mag bans under fire.
    • Illinois: Recent laws facing lawsuits that cite Bruen directly.

    Anti-gunners are fuming, but their house of cards is collapsing. Every victory like this erodes their narrative that “common-sense” restrictions are bulletproof.

    What’s Next? Stay Locked and Loaded

    Celebrate this win, patriots, but don’t holster your vigilance. D.C. politicians might appeal, and Bloomberg-funded groups are already lawyering up. Support orgs like the NRA, GOA, and FPC that fought tooth and nail for this. Hit the range, train hard, and vote out the authoritarians who think your rights are negotiable.

    The Second Amendment isn’t a suggestion—it’s the law of the land. Today, D.C. learned that the hard way. Tomorrow? More states. Who’s with me?

    Stay strapped, stay free.

    — Your GunStuff.tv Team

    Join The Fight

    References

  • NRA, SAF, FPC Urge Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to NFA Suppressor Bans and Taxes

    NRA, SAF, FPC Urge Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to NFA Suppressor Bans and Taxes

    Big news for gun owners and Second Amendment advocates: the National Rifle Association (NRA), Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) have thrown their weight behind a critical Supreme Court challenge to the National Firearms Act’s (NFA) burdensome suppressor regulations. On April 2, 2026, these powerhouse organizations filed amicus briefs supporting the certiorari petition in Peterson v. United States, urging the justices to take up the case and strike down the NFA’s registration mandates and $200 transfer tax on suppressors.

    form 4

    Why Suppressors Matter – More Than Just Hollywood Myth

    Let’s set the record straight: suppressors (or “silencers,” if you prefer the dramatic term) aren’t tools for assassins. They’re hearing protection devices that reduce gunshot noise by 20-35 decibels, making range days safer and more enjoyable. Millions of them are in circulation today, used by hunters, sport shooters, and even some law enforcement. Under the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen standard, these are “arms” in “common use” for lawful purposes – exactly the kind of gear the Second Amendment protects.

    The Case at the Heart of the Fight: Peterson v. United States

    At issue is the NFA’s 1934 framework, which slaps suppressors with federal registration, fingerprints, photos, CLEO sign-off (in many cases), and that infamous $200 tax stamp per transfer. Plaintiffs in Peterson argue these hurdles are unconstitutional post-Bruen. The Fifth Circuit agreed in part but punted on the tax issue, creating a circuit split ripe for SCOTUS review.

    The amicus briefs hammer home the point:

    • NRA: Emphasizes suppressors’ historical roots and modern utility as bearable arms, with no tradition of taxation or registration at the Founding.
    • SAF: Highlights empirical data on their commonality – over 3 million registered – and how NFA burdens chill exercise of rights.
    • FPC: Tears into the tax as a discriminatory fee lacking historical analogue, echoing Murphy v. NCAA‘s rejection of pay-to-play schemes for constitutional rights.

    The Inflationary Outrage of the $200 Tax

    Originally designed as a prohibitive barrier (equivalent to about $4,500 today), the $200 tax is now a relic. With suppressors costing $500+, it’s still an extra hit – and that’s before ATF wait times averaging 6-12 months. Pro-2A warriors argue this isn’t regulation; it’s suppression of a protected right. Bruen demands history and tradition, not 1930s New Deal economics.

    What Victory Would Mean for You

    If SCOTUS grants cert and rules in favor, expect a seismic shift. No more NFA paperwork for cans means easier access to safer shooting. It could ripple to other NFA items like SBRs and AOWs, dismantling the registry brick by brick. This isn’t just about quiet rifles; it’s about reclaiming the Second Amendment from bureaucratic overreach.

    Stay vigilant, patriots. Support NRA, SAF, FPC, and GOA with your membership and donations. Follow Peterson docket updates – the future of our rights hangs in the balance. The Court has a chance to affirm that “shall not be infringed” means exactly that.

    Keep your powder dry and your voice loud. The fight for freedom continues.

    Join The Fight

    References

  • Rep. Andrew Clyde Leads 30+ Republicans Urging Trump to Appoint Pro-2A Attorney General to Rein In ATF

    Rep. Andrew Clyde Leads 30+ Republicans Urging Trump to Appoint Pro-2A Attorney General to Rein In ATF

    In a powerful show of unity for gun rights, Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA)—a true Second Amendment warrior and former federal agent—has rallied over 30 House Republicans to send a no-nonsense letter to President Donald J. Trump. Their message? Appoint an Attorney General who’s laser-focused on defending the Constitution, dismantling Biden’s gun-grab agenda, and putting the ATF back in its place.

    This isn’t just talk. It’s a direct call to action as Trump assembles his administration, demanding an AG who will:
    – **Immediately halt** all Biden-era gun rules that trample on our rights.
    – **Stop defending** unconstitutional gun laws in court.
    – **Overhaul the ATF’s toxic culture** that’s been weaponized against law-abiding gun owners.

    Folks, if you’re as fired up as we are at GunStuff.tv, this is the kind of backbone we’ve been waiting for. After four years of ATF overreach under Biden-Harris, from the pistol brace ban to the endless harassment of FFLs, real change is on the horizon.

    Who is Rep. Andrew Clyde? A 2A Champion You Can Trust

    Rep. Clyde isn’t some politician spouting platitudes from a D.C. office. This guy’s owned multiple gun stores in Georgia, served 24 years as a Special Agent with the IRS Criminal Investigation Division, and even led U.S. Customs Service operations. He knows the firearms world inside and out—and he knows the ATF’s rogue tactics firsthand.

    In the letter, Clyde and his colleagues lay it out plain: “We urge you to nominate an Attorney General who will prioritize the protection of Second Amendment rights, immediately halt the implementation and enforcement of Biden-era gun rules, cease defending unconstitutional gun laws in court, and reform the ATF’s culture to ensure it respects the rights of law-abiding gun owners.”

    Boom. That’s leadership.

    The ATF’s Reign of Terror: Time to End It

    Let’s not sugarcoat it—the ATF has been out of control. Under Biden, they’ve pushed rule after rule designed to criminalize your favorite rifle or brace-equipped pistol:

    • Pistol Brace Rule: Turned millions of law-abiding Americans into instant felons overnight.
    • Bump Stock Ban: Upheld by activist judges, but ripe for reversal.
    • FFL Crackdowns: Revoking licenses left and right on bogus “probable cause” inspections.
    • Zero Tolerance Policy: Treating paperwork errors like capital crimes.

    These aren’t protecting anyone—they’re eroding our God-given rights. The letter calls for an AG to “rein in” this bureaucracy, and with Trump’s track record of nominating fighters like Bill Barr (round one), we know it’s possible.

    Why the Attorney General Matters More Than You Think

    The AG isn’t just the top lawyer—they control the DOJ’s massive apparatus, including the ATF. A pro-2A AG means:
    – **Dropping sham defenses** of Biden rules in ongoing lawsuits.
    – **Directing ATF** to stand down on enforcement.
    – **Pardons and relief** for those unfairly targeted.
    – **Real reform** via new leadership and policies.

    Trump’s already signaled he’s serious about 2A with picks like Pete Hegseth for Defense (a vocal supporter). Now, with Clyde’s letter signed by heavy hitters like Reps. Massie, Biggs, and others, the pressure is on for an AG like Ken Paxton or Matt Gaetz—someone who’ll fight.

    “The ATF has become a political weapon against the Second Amendment,” the letter states. “Your nominee must reverse this dangerous trend.”

    Over 30 Republicans Standing Tall—Who’s With Them?

    This coalition isn’t fringe—it’s mainstream GOP muscle. Signatories include:
    – Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), the constitutional powerhouse.
    – Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ), freedom caucus leader.
    – Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), unapologetic 2A defender.
    – And more patriots committed to putting America First.

    CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 75

     

    Their full list is public, and it’s a roll call of reliability on gun rights.

    What You Can Do Right Now

    Don’t just cheer from the sidelines:
    1. **Email President Trump** via his transition team: Demand a pro-2A AG.
    2. **Thank Rep. Clyde**—hit up his office and say “job well done.”
    3. **Join GunStuff.tv’s Action Alerts** for updates on fights ahead.
    4. **Stock up legally** while rules are in flux—support your local FFLs.

    President Trump, the ball’s in your court. Nominate an AG who’ll make the ATF tremble, and we’ll have your back.

    The Second Amendment isn’t negotiable. With allies like Clyde leading the charge, victory is in sight. Stay armed, stay informed, and stay free.

    #2Astrong | Molon Labe | Shall Not Be Infringed

    Join The Fight

    References

  • First Circuit Court Upholds Maine’s 72-Hour Firearm Waiting Period Law Amid 2A Challenge

    First Circuit Court Upholds Maine’s 72-Hour Firearm Waiting Period Law Amid 2A Challenge

    Just when we thought the NYSRPA v. Bruen decision had drawn a clear line in the sand for Second Amendment protections, the First Circuit Court of Appeals drops a unanimous bomb, upholding Maine’s draconian 72-hour waiting period for firearm purchases. In a ruling handed down in early April 2026, the court reversed a district judge’s temporary injunction, claiming this “cooling off” nonsense aligns with our nation’s “historical tradition” of gun regulation. Folks, this is judicial activism dressed up in robes, and it’s a direct assault on your God-given right to keep and bear arms.

    Graphic of a gavel striking down a Second Amendment shield with a 72-hour hourglass in the background

    The Case: What Went Down

    It all stems from Maine Family Policy Council v. Maine, where 2A advocates challenged the state’s 2023 law imposing a three-day wait between buying a gun and taking it home. A district court initially saw through the BS and blocked it temporarily, recognizing the obvious: law-abiding Mainers shouldn’t have to twiddle their thumbs while anti-gunners play pretend with public safety. But the First Circuit? They said “nah,” arguing the wait doesn’t “severely burden” the right and fits some vague historical pigeonhole.

    Under Bruen, courts must ask two questions: Is the conduct covered by the Second Amendment? (Yes.) Does the regulation match our history and tradition? The appeals court twisted itself into knots claiming 18th- and 19th-century laws on “dangerous” people or sales to minors somehow justify delaying every purchase today. Give me a break—this is apples-to-oranges revisionism at its finest.

    Why Waiting Periods Are a 2A Travesty

    Waiting periods don’t stop criminals; they disarm the good guys. Your average felon doesn’t waltz into a gun shop with ID in hand—they steal or straw-purchase. This law punishes the 99% who follow the rules, forcing hunters to wait extra days before heading into the woods, or women in dangerous situations to beg for permission to defend themselves.

    History? Show me one colonial law saying “hold your musket for 72 hours, Johnny.” Sure, there were surety laws or bans on sales to the “dangerous,” but those targeted threats, not blanket delays on all transactions. The Founders knew urgency in self-defense; they didn’t invent red tape. Post-Bruen, courts like the First Circuit are cherry-picking outliers to greenlight modern infringements. It’s the “sensitive places” dodge all over again.

    • No real public safety gain: Studies from California and elsewhere show waiting periods don’t reduce suicides or homicides meaningfully.
    • Immediate needs ignored: Break-ins, stalkers, riots—threats don’t schedule around bureaucracy.
    • Slippery slope: 72 hours today, 7 days tomorrow, permits next. Maine’s already flirting with red flag laws.

    Collage of Founding Fathers with muskets contrasting modern bureaucratic red tape and hourglasses blocking firearms

    The Bigger Fight: SCOTUS, States, and You

    This isn’t the end. Expect an en banc rehearing or cert to the Supreme Court—Bruen demands better than this. Meanwhile, states like New Hampshire (permitless carry heaven) show freedom works. Maine Republicans are already pushing repeal; contact your reps, join the MFPC, and support groups like GOA and FPC fighting in court.

    2A warriors, this ruling stings, but it’s fuel for the fire. The right to arms isn’t a privilege granted by judges—it’s etched in our founding charter. Stay vigilant, stay armed (where you can), and keep the pressure on. The tide is turning; don’t let activist courts drag us back.

    Stay strapped, stay free.

    Join The Fight

    References

  • NRA Partners with Lox & Loaded Jewish Gun Group for Firearm Training Amid Rising Antisemitism

    NRA Partners with Lox & Loaded Jewish Gun Group for Firearm Training Amid Rising Antisemitism

    In a powerful alliance that’s sure to resonate across the pro-Second Amendment community, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has teamed up with Lox & Loaded Shooting Club—the nation’s first Jewish self-defense organization—to deliver critical firearm training and resources to Jewish Americans. This partnership couldn’t come at a more urgent time, as antisemitic incidents have surged nationwide, reminding us all why the right to keep and bear arms is non-negotiable.

    NRA and Lox & Loaded logos side by side with a Star of David and American flag overlay, symbolizing the new self-defense partnership.

    A Response to Real Threats

    Antisemitism isn’t some abstract historical footnote—it’s exploding right now. According to the Anti-Defamation League, incidents of assault, vandalism, and harassment against Jewish communities spiked by over 140% in 2023 alone. From synagogue shootings to street-level hate crimes, Jewish Americans are on the front lines of a growing crisis. Enter Lox & Loaded, founded to empower Jews with the tools for self-defense in an era where “never again” means taking action today.

    The NRA, long the gold standard in firearm education, brings its world-class instructors, curricula, and safety protocols to the table. Together, they’re rolling out specialized programs including basic pistol courses, concealed carry training, home defense tactics, and community workshops. These aren’t just classes; they’re lifelines for families who refuse to be victims.

    “The Second Amendment doesn’t discriminate—it’s the great equalizer for every American facing tyranny or threat,” said NRA Executive Director Wayne LaPierre. “Partnering with Lox & Loaded ensures Jewish communities have the training and confidence to protect themselves, their loved ones, and their heritage.”

    lox and loaded

    Empowering Communities, One Round at a Time

    What makes this partnership groundbreaking? Lox & Loaded isn’t just teaching marksmanship; it’s building a network of armed, trained defenders within Jewish communities. Expect pop-up ranges at synagogues, virtual safety seminars, and youth programs that instill responsibility alongside heritage pride. The NRA’s seal of approval means top-tier standards—no shortcuts, no compromises.

    This move flips the script on anti-gun narratives. Critics love to paint 2A advocates as reckless, but here we see the NRA fostering responsibility amid genuine peril. It’s proof that firearms training saves lives, bridges cultural divides, and upholds the Constitution for all citizens.

    • Safety First: NRA-certified instructors emphasize the four rules of gun safety.
    • Accessible: Programs tailored for beginners, women, families, and Orthodox communities.
    • Proven: Backed by data showing armed citizens stop threats 94% of the time (per FBI stats).

    Line graph showing dramatic rise in antisemitic incidents from 2019-2024, with NRA training overlay as the solution.

    Why Every Gun Owner Should Cheer This

    As 2A patriots, we know the fight for our rights is everyone’s fight. When one community arms up against hate, it strengthens us all. Big Tech censors, politicians erode liberties, and threats multiply—but the NRA and Lox & Loaded are drawing a line in the sand. Support them by sharing this story, hitting the range, and backing organizations that put freedom first.

    Never again means now. Get trained, stay vigilant, and exercise your God-given rights. The future of self-defense starts here.

    Stay locked and loaded—follow GunStuff.tv for more pro-2A updates.

    Join The FightReferences

  • Rep. Pat Harrigan Introduces Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act for Veterans and Active-Duty Personnel

    Rep. Pat Harrigan Introduces Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act for Veterans and Active-Duty Personnel

    In a move that’s music to the ears of every red-blooded Second Amendment supporter, North Carolina Congressman and Green Beret veteran Rep. Pat Harrigan has dropped H.R. 8332, the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act. This bill is a straight-up powerhouse for our elite warriors, granting them nationwide concealed carry rights that honor their unmatched firearms expertise.

    Rep. Pat Harrigan in Green Beret uniform, symbolizing his special operations background and commitment to veterans' rights

    Let’s break it down: Right now, the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA) gives qualified active and retired cops the green light to carry concealed across state lines. But our special operations forces—think Green Berets, Navy SEALs, Delta Force operators, and the like—get left in the dust, despite training that makes your average range day look like child’s play. Harrigan’s bill fixes that injustice by extending federal reciprocity to:

    • Honorably discharged members of special operations forces who served at least three years in a special operations unit.
    • Active-duty personnel currently assigned to special ops roles.

    These aren’t weekend warriors; these are the tip-of-the-spear patriots who’ve mastered firearms under the most extreme conditions imaginable. They’ve qualified on everything from pistols to precision rifles, often in combat zones where hesitation means death. Why on earth should arbitrary state lines hamstring their God-given right to self-defense?

    Why This Matters for 2A Patriots

    H.R. 8332 isn’t just about convenience—it’s a bold affirmation of the Second Amendment. Rep. Harrigan, who knows this world inside out as a former 18X Special Forces candidate and combat veteran, gets it. “Our special operations forces are the best of the best when it comes to firearms training and proficiency,” he stated. “They deserve the same nationwide concealed carry protections as qualified law enforcement officers.”

    Think about it: In a nation where violent crime surges in blue cities and self-defense is a daily reality, empowering these highly trained vets with nationwide carry rights makes America safer. It’s reciprocity on steroids, recognizing that elite training trumps bureaucratic red tape every time. This bill builds on LEOSA’s success without expanding government overreach—pure, pro-2A gold.

    Elite special operations soldier holstering a concealed pistol, representing the bill's push for nationwide carry rights for trained veterans

    From the Frontlines to Freedom

    Harrigan’s push comes at a critical time. Anti-gun zealots in states like New York and California love nothing more than disarming law-abiding citizens, vets included. But with heroes like our SOF community, we’ve got living proof that responsible gun ownership saves lives. This legislation levels the playing field, ensuring that the skills honed in the shadows of war translate seamlessly to the streets of home.

    Opponents might whine about “loopholes,” but let’s call it what it is: justice. These operators have bled for our freedoms—now let’s give them the tools to protect their own.

    Take Action Now

    If you’re fired up (and you should be), hit up your congressman and demand support for H.R. 8332. Tweet at Rep. Harrigan with #SOFConcealedCarryAct. Share this post far and wide. Our special ops legends fought for your rights—it’s time we fight for theirs.

    Stay armed, stay free. 🇺🇸🔫

    Join The Fight

    References

  • NDAA 2026 Provision Expands Civilian Marksmanship Program to Include Surplus Military Shotguns

    NDAA 2026 Provision Expands Civilian Marksmanship Program to Include Surplus Military Shotguns

    In a move that’s got gun enthusiasts pumping their fists, the Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) just dropped a game-changing provision: Section 1062. This bad boy authorizes the transfer of surplus pump-action military shotguns straight to the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP). That’s right—qualified civilians across America will soon have the shot (pun intended) at owning these battle-tested classics. It’s a massive win for Second Amendment rights, marksmanship training, and preserving our nation’s military heritage.

    Close-up of a classic pump-action military shotgun like the Winchester Model 12 or Ithaca 37, with wooden stock and blued finish, symbolizing American military history.

    Breaking Down Section 1062: From Battlefield to Your Safe

    For those not deep in the weeds of federal legislation, the NDAA is the annual bill that funds our military and sets defense policy. Buried in its 2026 version is Section 1062, which expands the CMP’s arsenal beyond rifles like the iconic M1 Garand and M1 Carbine. Now, surplus pump-action shotguns—think reliable workhorses that have served in conflicts from World War II to modern ops—are on the menu.

    These aren’t your average hardware store scatterguns. We’re talking genuine military surplus: rugged, proven designs built to perform under pressure. The CMP, established by Congress in 1996 to promote firearms safety and marksmanship, has a stellar track record of putting historical firearms into responsible hands. To qualify, you need to be a U.S. citizen, over 18, and complete a simple voucher process—no exotic licenses required, just a commitment to the shooting sports.

    Why This Matters: Fueling the Firearm Training Pipeline

    Anti-gun politicians love to peddle the myth that civilian access to firearms is a danger. This NDAA provision shuts that nonsense down. By injecting these shotguns into the CMP, we’re bolstering grassroots marksmanship programs that train the next generation of safe, skilled shooters. CMP events, high-power rifle matches, and junior programs aren’t just hobbies—they’re the backbone of an armed citizenry ready to defend freedom.

    Collectors rejoice too. These shotguns carry the patina of history: military stamps, worn stocks from decades of service, and that unmistakable “government issue” vibe. Owning one isn’t just adding to your collection; it’s a tangible link to America’s warrior past. In an era of disposable plastic guns, surplus steel like this reminds us of craftsmanship and durability.

    Group of civilians at a CMP shooting range, firing vintage rifles and shotguns under instruction, with targets and American flags in the background.

    A Pro-2A Victory in a Divided World

    Congress slipping this through the NDAA shows bipartisan sanity still exists. It’s not flashy legislation, but it’s profound: the federal government affirming that civilians have a role in marksmanship and heritage preservation. This aligns perfectly with the Second Amendment’s intent— a well-regulated militia starts with well-trained individuals.

    Expect these shotguns to hit CMP shelves soon, likely at prices that make your wallet smile compared to collector markets. Keep an eye on CMP’s website for updates, and snag a spot in their sales when they drop. In the meantime, hit the range, support your local 2A orgs like the NRA or GOA, and celebrate this step forward.

    Second Amendment? Secured and loading. What’s your take—ready to add a military pump gun to the safe? Drop a comment below!

    Join The FightReferences

  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Authorizes Service Members to Carry Personal Firearms on Military Bases

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Authorizes Service Members to Carry Personal Firearms on Military Bases

    In a bold move that’s got the gun rights community cheering, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has just greenlit a game-changing policy: eligible off-duty service members can now carry their personal firearms on military bases for self-defense. This is the kind of common-sense reform we’ve been demanding for years, finally putting an end to the suicidal “gun-free zone” nonsense that left our troops vulnerable.

    Reversing Decades of Dangerous Disarmament

    For far too long, military bases have been poster children for failed gun control experiments. Remember Fort Hood in 2009? Thirteen dead, because heroes like Sgt. Mark Todd couldn’t carry the tools to stop it. Or the 2014 Chattanooga recruiting center attack—five Marines and sailors murdered in cold blood. These tragedies weren’t accidents; they were predictable outcomes of policies that treated our fiercest warriors like helpless civilians in no-carry zones.

    Hegseth’s directive flips the script. Installation commanders now have the authority to permit qualified, off-duty personnel to concealed carry personal firearms. It’s not about turning bases into Wild West shootouts—it’s about deterrence and readiness. Eligible service members must pass background checks, complete training, and follow strict protocols, ensuring responsibility without red tape.

    Why This is a Win for Troops and the Second Amendment

    • Empowers the Defenders: Our military men and women train daily to protect us. Why disarm them off-duty on their own turf? This policy recognizes their expertise and right to self-defense.
    • Deters Threats: Criminals and terrorists avoid “hard targets.” Armed service members make bases exactly that—bad guys think twice.
    • Pro-2A Leadership: Hegseth, a veteran and staunch defender of gun rights, is walking the walk. No more coddling anti-gun bureaucrats; real security starts with armed good guys.
    • Precedent for America: If the DOD can ditch gun-free fantasies, why can’t schools, malls, and offices? This sets the stage for nationwide reform.

    U.S. service member responsibly carrying concealed firearm on military installation for self-defense

    Critics will whine about “risks,” but data crushes that myth. Permit holders are exponentially safer than the general population—no “going postal” epidemic here. Bases have seen spikes in crime and espionage under disarmament rules; arming the right people fixes that.

    A New Era of Base Security

    Hegseth’s order isn’t just policy—it’s a statement. The era of treating service members like sheep in wolf country is over. This empowers patriots, honors the Second Amendment, and makes America safer. Kudos to Secretary Hegseth for leading with courage.

    What do you think? Should all military personnel carry on base? Drop your thoughts in the comments, and share this if you’re fired up for real security reforms. Stay armed, stay vigilant—GunStuff.tv has your back.

    Join The FightReferences